cc431
Posted : 6/4/2006 5:34:16 PM
ORIGINAL: Goldstein, also a vegetarian, fed his dogs and cats a meat based diet and told the vegans that if they didn't give their dog meat it would die. They refused to do so and the dog died several days later.
Good point!
One of Jayes link stated the dog is "capable" of being kept on a vegetarian diet. Makes no mention of the quality of life or if the dog would actually "thrive" on a meat based diet. All they indicate it is "capable" of survival. There is a difference between simply surviving (barely) and thriving.
Another posted link stated this: "Named after the Aztec God-dog Xoloti and often eaten by its Mexican breeders..." OK, so if that is the case, no wonder it starts out as a vegetarian. Why waste the meat if the dog is supper in a few months anyway? Meat no doubt took effort (must be hunted...no guns back then) and desperately needed for the tribe. Oh my, what a wonderful way to justify and promote the vegan way of life for dogs as some websites attempt (look through the smoke). All dogs may be "capable" of a vegan diet, but for how long and what about the quality of life. Gosh, hate to see those Vet bills.
To back up Jesssies_mom in regards to Goldstein and his warning not heeded by naive pet owners we find a quote from the Abady Articles-raw diets:
"The problem with the current raw diets is that most of them are primarily composed of plant matter which is indigestible to the dog (and cat), even though it is well known that feeding raw plant matter exclusively to dogs will result in starvation, because dogs do not produce the enzymes needed to break down cellulose (there are many other reasons as well). "
Note, this is in regards to commercial raw diets being sold in attempt to capitalize on the BARF or carnivore theme. They still insist on cheapening the mix by adding raw plant matter...anything to increase profit margin. Thank goodness the home-prepared raw feeders need not worry for they can regulate what's going into the ration