Feeding your dog less will help prolong their life...

    • Gold Top Dog

    Feeding your dog less will help prolong their life...

    Eating less results in longer lives, a 14-year CU dog-diet study confirms By Lissa Harris
       
    Seventy years after a classic Cornell nutritional study showed that cutting rations dramatically prolongs rats' lives, nutrition scientists have come up with even more evidence of the benefit of slender diets: A recently completed 14-year study found that dogs forced to eat 25 percent less than their littermates of the same balanced diet lived significantly longer and suffered fewer canine diseases. In an age of increasing incidence of obesity among Americans, "maybe it's time we watched what the rats and the dogs are eating," advises George Lust, a Cornell professor of veterinary medicine and a collaborator in the experiment with dogs, sponsored by the Nestlé Purina Pet Care Co. A specialist in bone and joint diseases in animals, Lust saw the underfed dogs incurring much less canine hip dysplasia (CHD) and subsequent osteoarthritis, compared with dogs that were fed the portions indicated on the pet food packages.
        The dogs on reduced rations also lived nearly two years longer. In animal nutritionist Clive McCay's 1930s' demonstration of the power of portion control on health, rats on an experimentally reduced diet lived half again as long as rats on "normal" diets. His findings with rats are well known to every nutritionist, but determining the implications for human health has remained a challenge. The dog study comes closer, providing the strongest evidence yet that diet restriction confers benefits of health and longevity on larger mammals. While the benefits of diet reduction have been demonstrated in animals from chickens to single-celled organisms, dogs are our closest evolutionary relatives in which a reduced diet definitively has been shown to enhance health and lengthen life. The ambitious dog study was led by researchers at Nestlé Purina, and included scientists at Cornell, the University of Illinois, Michigan State University and the University of Pennsylvania. Results of the study were published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association in May.
         The study also was the focus of a September symposium in St. Louis, sponsored by Nestlé Purina, called "Advancing Life Through Diet Restriction." In the study, 24 pairs of Labrador retriever siblings between 6 and 8 weeks of age -- matched by sex and weight-- were selected, with one of each pair assigned to eat 25 percent less food than its sibling. The dogs were a part of the study from the time they were weaned until they died, and their health was closely monitored throughout their lives. The median age of dogs in the reduced-diet group, the researchers found, was 13 years -- 1.8 years longer than the median age of dogs fed a normal diet. As a result of genetic factors, Labradors are predisposed to develop CHD and osteoarthritis. Lust, a professor of physiological chemistry at the James A. Baker Institute for Animal Health at Cornell, followed the development of the disease in the 48 dogs in the study. He found striking effects of diet on the progression of the disease, even in young animals. "It was dramatic. In the control group of 24 dogs -- the well-fed dogs -- 16 had CHD at 2 years of age, and eight were normal," Lust said. "Of the 24 dogs in the restricted diet group, only eight had CHD and 16 were normal."
        The reduced diet also was found to reduce the risk of developing osteoarthritis, which generally results from CHD and is one of the most common sources of chronic pain treated by veterinarians. It is also the most common form of arthritis in humans, affecting over 20 million people in the United States. Only six dogs on the reduced diet developed osteoarthritis of the hip by age 10, while 19 of the dogs in the control group developed the condition. And for dogs with CHD and on reduced rations, the diet decreased the odds of developing osteoarthritis by 57 percent. Similar studies involving primates are under way at the University of Wisconsin. Because of the long life span of monkeys, however, it will be years before the results of those studies are known. December 12, 2002
    • Gold Top Dog
    What I would like to know is what amount the "regular amount" dogs were getting, and what they looked like. Photos would be really great, so we can see how much less heavy the "reduced" group is. It definitely makes sense that carrying less weight extends their lives. Each pound of fat takes miles of blood vessels to supply it, and more weight on the skeletal structure is always bad...
    • Gold Top Dog
    I think the "regular amount" they were talking about is the recommended amount on the bags of dog food.
    • Gold Top Dog
    And they lived 13 years being fed Purina.
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: abbysdad

    And they lived 13 years being fed Purina.


    ?? I'm a little confused....what was that in reference to? lol.

    **EDIT---oh, you're referring to the study....wow, I need a vacation; I'm so brainwashed right now...[sm=crazy.gif]
    • Gold Top Dog
    And they lived 13 years being fed Purina.


    See, to me... that's not all that impressive. I hope to keep my dogs around significantly longer than that.
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: abbysdad

    And they lived 13 years being fed Purina.

    My mom's cat lived to be 23 eating Fancy Feast and Friskies, or whatever else was on sale at the grocery store. But she died with a cancerous tumor in her head. No matter how long my mom's cat lived eating junk I won't stop feeding my dog a premium quality food. There's more to consider than just the number of years lived IMO.
    • Gold Top Dog


    See, to me... that's not all that impressive. I hope to keep my dogs around significantly longer than that.


    I agree 100%

    • Gold Top Dog
    " See, to me... that's not all that impressive. I hope to keep my dogs around significantly longer than that. "

    13 years isn't long for small dogs like Jack Russells or Papillons but that's pretty good for Labs, which were the dogs used in this study. I didn't see in the first post which of the foods that Purina makes was used for the study; I'd assume it was one of their "top" ( I use that term loosely) products like Pro Plan or Purina One. My vet told me that the dog food companies recommend feeding more than is needed and I've read that also.
    • Gold Top Dog
    Ummm... most of the well cared for large dogs I know live more than 13 years. Tom Tom, my best friend's childhood dog, was a GSD/Lab X and lived to be 16, on Ol Roy. Lori has GSDs older than 13 (Neke is 14, I think, and still plays frisbee!). I groomed an Aussie/Chow mix last week, who is 15. We just lost one of our regulars, Mariah, the Golden, at 16. Mariah was NOT well cared for. She was not vetted and had serious skin and ear infections. I've groomed quite a few elderly labs, between 14 and 16 years of age.

    My mom's 40 pound mutt will be 13 next month, and still plays with Emma, races around the yard, etc etc.
    • Gold Top Dog
    And wild canids live between 4 to 8 years. Domesticated dogs live longer because we feed them regularly.
    • Gold Top Dog
    Regardless of the source, it IS true that we are a nation of fatties.....fat kids, fat dogs, fat people......and fat is not as healthy as lean.
    • Gold Top Dog
    well, but does anyone actually feed their dog the amount of food listed on the packages?  I find most dogs need about half of what is recommended to maintain a lean body. So feeding 25% less than the package recommends is no big deal.
     
    labs are very long-lived in general aren't they? I personally know of two that are over 16 and still going.
    • Gold Top Dog
    My Shih Tzu averages about a half cup of feed daily.  His food says about 1 cup of food a day.  Someday's Harley eats less then half a cup and sometimes its almost 3/4.   He is on a free choice feeding program and he is in the ideal weight range.  I also make sure Harley gets exercise between walking him and playing to keep him helathy and active.  Although I think having kids around helps him want to stay active.  I guess what the study may be saying is if you don't over feed your dog he could live longer?  I only use the directions on the bag as an approximation as to how much he should be eating.  As I am sure most people on here do.
    • Gold Top Dog
     Okay, I guess 13 isn't that impressive for Labs.[:)]  I don't know enough owners of large dogs to get a good idea and I thought 13 was old for large dogs.I'm glad to hear of the GSd/Lab mix that lived to be 16 on Ol Roy because we think Jessie is the same mix with a little Beagle thrown in and we would like to have her around for a very long time.
          "  well, but does anyone actually feed their dog the amount of food listed on the packages?  I find most dogs need about half of what is recommended to maintain a lean body."
     
      It took us awhile to learn that lesson. Jessie is our first dog and was actually underweight when we adopted her. We fed her a high performance dog food made by Eukanuba ( we know better than to feed that brand now) at the amount recommended and almost before we knew it, she was overweight. We swithed her to a Eukanuba maintenance formula and still had trouble with her weight. She is on Eagle Pack Holistic Fish now and I feed her about a third less than the recommended amount. If she wasn't exercised an average of 9 hours a week she would be fed even less.