brookcove
Posted : 11/15/2006 10:59:38 AM
I like Kelly's points a lot. I've had my post chores shower, breakfast, and a Coke, and I've got some ideas now on neutral terminology.
Foods are better divided by function. When these discussions come up, seems like we get a lot of sputtering, "But I feed X because of . . ."
Like Scout said, there's High Protein, Grain Free, Single Protein/Meat (technically the carb sources add some protein too), Holistic/Organics, and Special Needs (including prescription diets and a lot of the Royal Canin line). Among the other foods there's Economy, Economy High Energy, Economy Special Needs, and, I'm at a loss here - the compromise feeds like Nutro and the higher end Purina products. And I honestly don't know what to call Science Diet, Iams, and Euk since it's not economy or holistic but it's not a special needs deal. Maybe "If You Really MUST"?
It's a start. I'm looking for value-neutral terminology, remember (so I guess we'll have to call ix-nay on that last little slip [

] ).