Chris
Posted : 11/6/2006 3:34:35 PM
Sandra feeds Purina and is not stupid and she has labwork to show how well her dogs are doing..
Once again, I never said Sandra was stupid. I implied that people who blindly trust manufacturers' claims are stupid. Do you disagree?
If you said buyers who are willing to trust the makers are stupid you couldn't be talking about Sandra because she trusts nothing 100 %...
I didn't say buyers who trust makers. I said people who blindly trust manufacturers' claims. There is a difference.
She goes by hard results which are, even with her documentation and, I imagine, more years with dogs than you've been alive, are not acceptable here. And others besides her have gone the full route and have studied nutrition just as much as anyone else here, even going beyond the precious ingredient list, only to find their dog does best on Purina.
Again (for those in the back who may not have heard me the first 57 times), there is no way to know how your dog will respond to ANY given food without trying it (how many times do I have to say this?). However, when choosing a food, it pays to compare apples to apples, not stories.
It happens, even if you don't want to accept it
I accept and believe that dog can do well on crap. I never disputed this. I have said this many times. My only point of debate is that a food does not inherit a "quality" status based on anecdotal evidence. And, regardless of how many centuries you or Sandra have been alive, it is all still anecdotal.
and imply that people who buy big brands are stupid. It still doesn't change that fact.
(sigh) Big brand buyers are not stupid. Dogs do well on various things. I believe that dogs can live long lives on different things, including Purina. Feed whatever you want, your choice. You are not stupid for doing so. My one and only point is:
TAKE AWAY THE ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE, AND ADVISE A DOG OWNER WHAT FOOD TO BUY...HOW DO YOU DO IT? Ultimatlely, it's going to come down to ingredients.