sandra_slayton
Posted : 11/8/2006 5:34:06 PM
According to your post you feed Purina One Senior and Purina One weight managment. Aren't those rather different from your "50 year" feed? The quantity of supplements is quite significant a well.
I'm not saying you are in any way "sponsored" by Purina but your (non paid) endorsement reminds me of paid endorsers and athletes who endorse something but do not use any of the products that the public buys but have custom made versions.
You don't believe I use Purina? Come to my house any time you wish and see what is in my garage in food storage bin. Count the bags I have saved to put fish and duck remains in. Mine have only been on the One about 6 weeks. Up until then, the girls were on Fit & Trim and Buck was on Chow for 11 years , the same chow my dad fed his hunting dogs and i have fed my dogs and this goes back 50 years. I got my very own first dog 50 years ago this past June
You are more than welcome to go talk to my vet and I will give him permission to share all of my dogs records, test result, blood panels with you . Also, you will see it marked in HIS records that my dogs are on Purina. Maybe then you will believe it when I say I feed Purina.
I see many people here "endorsing" what they feed their dogs if that is the way you look at it. Do they also remind you of the athletes, etc that endorse products they do not use? Or does that only apply to us that say we use Purina, Hills, Iam, Pedigree, etc. I do not believe a dog has to have the Caviar and Lobster tail of dog food to be healthy. As a matter of fact, richer food often cause stuff like gout in humans, so why not cause stuff in dogs if they are not able to tolerate it?
I was told a couple of weeks ago that I was brainwashed by Purina's ads. I have just about come to the conclusion that some of the ones on this board are brainwashed into believing no dog can be healhty that isn't on premium food...no matter what the owner, vet, medical records, physicals, etc say.