Chris
Posted : 10/26/2006 9:28:06 AM
Based entirely on threads in this forum, the following information has been offered and accepted:
1) No two dogs are alike
2) Some dogs do well on "grocery store" brands
3) Some dogs do well on “premium” brands
4) Some dogs get sick on grocery store brands
5) Some dogs get sick on premium brands
Now, imagine you are at a party with 3 other dog owners and a brand new puppy owner. The 4 dog owners each feed Ol#%92 Roy, Canidae, Science Diet and Purina One, respectively. The puppy owner asks this group of trusted friends which food she should feed her puppy.
Each owner extols the virtue of his or her chosen food based on the respective dog#%92s present condition (which we#%92ve seen is entirely possible). Which food does the puppy owner choose? From a purely logical perspective, the puppy owner has received nothing except opinion (stories, word of mouth, whatever you want to call it…).
Now I come in and put the 4 brands of dog food side by side, and compare ingredient quantities, caloric density, total protein, total fat, presence of preservatives and known carcinogens etc. Would this arm the puppy owner with any more information? OF COURSE IT WOULD!!! Could she make an educated guess, with only this information, which is the higher quality food? Again, of course she could. Further, she could compare prices, and make an educated decision on which food gave her the most “bang” for her buck.
What she can#%92t do is determine unequivocally which food her dog will do best on based on any of this information. But we all agree that nobody can do that without trying a brand anyway, so that#%92s a moot point.
Feed your dog whatever you want. But don#%92t try to tell me that Kibbles & Bits is “just as good” as Canidae because your dog appears healthy.