rwbeagles
Posted : 11/6/2008 11:21:07 AM
I have seen studies that claim incontinence, taller leaner dogs, etc from early spay neuter. But you have to balance that, against the near zero risk of things like testicular cancer, mammary tumors, pyometra, perenial tumors etc...and since this is relating to SHELTER pets...against a system limited in their ability to FOLLOW UP and ensure spay's or neuters, are done AT ALL.
They have considerably less time, money, manpower to run around after the HUNDREDS of dogs and CATS a given shelter may place in a year, accounting for testicles and ovaries, than your average breeder who may have what 10 pups total in a year, as well as registration paperwork they can withhold.
the most important thing is that the animals in a shelter NOT add back more....period. If adopters are concerned about possible...and it's ONLY possible...incontinence in their bitch or "lankiness" in their dog....and that concern outweighs the importance of saving a LIFE...a shelter animal is likely not for them, anyway. Then they should find a reputable breeder or purebred or private general rescue that shares their views.
Anecdotally...I have in my extended family a near ELEVEN year old bitch who was adopted from a rescue...spayed at 8 weeks of age. She has no health issues and is not incontinent.
The alternative is to NOT adopt out animals "too young" to fix...meaning...no adoptions pre 6 months. Yeah...how's that going to affect their adoption numbers, and the numbers of Wal Mart puppy sales, and Pet Store sales? No win there, is what I say. Shelter animals already have persistant "preconceptions" about them being an iffy bet for a "good dog"....wrongly in many cases...but why add another "check against" shelter pets by never ever having young puppies available for adoption. Can you imagine the numbers of dogs they'd need to put down for space at that point simply because they cannot wait for them to BE old enough to neuter or spay? Sad.