Ratsicles
Posted : 12/4/2007 8:34:01 AM
No, I completely agree with your post, Dumdog- in alot of breeds, especially working breeds, you see a HUGE difference in show-bred dogs and working-bred dogs.
Chief comes from a long line of working Pyrs. They aren't registered, but they are purebred- and his breeders have had those lines in their family since I THINK the 50's- I have his lineage and family tree, it just isn't on AKC paper.
His particular breeder doesn't like kennel club registrations for working dogs, for a lot of reasons- but that's a whole 'nother can of worms.
But in Chief's case, it's been "best working dog to best working dog" for generations- with no thought to show conformation other than whether or not the dogs stayed sound enough to do their jobs. Chief's parents look EXACTLY like that old style Pyr you posted, and Chief looks like that too- he has a much shorter, curlier coat than the show-bred Pyr. He's also going to be a bit smaller and less massive in general that most pet/show bred Pyrs I've seen- and a lot morer agile and athletic than they are, too.
We've got a really, really good dog in Chief- from some of the forums I'm on, it seems that most people have trouble finding Pyrs that TRULY come from working lines- and many of them have to buy show/companion bred dogs to raise as flock guardians. Many of them never make the cut, and many of those that do don't stop killing the stock and start working until they're a year or two of age. Chief was actively working by the time he was 4 months old. He's truly an awesome dog, and IMO how a REAL Pyrenees should be.
You can see his shorter, curlier coat in these shots:


His parents were really not that fluffy/hairy at all- it seems like chief and his parents have an entirely different texture to their coats than a show-bred Pyr.