babelfish
Posted : 11/26/2009 2:45:00 PM
dyan
I guess none of these NSAIDS are really completely safe for our dogs.
Well, nothing that doesn't belong into the body isn't safe to put in it. Hell, things that do belong into the body are not safe when there is excess of them. That said, it is rare and most dogs greatly benefit from the meds. I think NSAIDs are a genious idea as such. They tried to address the problems with the first type of products such as Rimadyl by developing drugs that work slightly differently, such as Previcox. I think the main problem is that no study seems to have been done to determine what combination of type of physiology/underlaying condition(s) will trigger the bad reaction to be able to test for it and prevent problems.
From what I observed, some vets will prescribe NSAIDs quite lightly for pretty much everything, while some do it selectively and with caution. Jasmine was the first case which presented a problem our vet came across. Their 'house dog' is on NDSAIDs long term, it's working for him and not causing any ill effects.
So I think it's like with everything, high caution needs to be used with any drugs, better education should be in place and the drug companies should find a way to determine which dogs could get NSAIDs safely and which dogs shouldn't get it.
But for obvious reasons, NSAIDs are not getting into my house any more.
Again, that said, Jasmine almost died twice, once from Buprenorphine which resulted in severe hyperthermia and almost killed her. Hyperthermia in dogs from these types of drugs is extremely rare.
On the other hand, while almost killing her it saved her life because it led to a discovery of a large abdonimal abscess. So go figure ...