Poll? Block function.

    • Gold Top Dog
    telluride

    ron2
    For a time, there was a poster here who seemed to consistently try and "dethrone" Spiritdogs, as if any dethroning needed to be done. And this person had in their sig a navajo quote that could be taken as a slight against others of first american ancestry. Most people here don't recognize or speak navajo, so the point of that sig was to take on Spiritdogs, who is of first american ancestry. Not in the interest of dogs, imo. More in the interest of something else ... truly jmo.

     

    Dethrone, I couldn't comment on that!

    **EDITED, rude and baiting behavior**

    Wow, that's quite a post for post number one telluride.
    • Gold Top Dog

    I always miss the good stuff. By the time I made it back to this thread today, it's been edited. Oh well, que sera, sera.

    • Gold Top Dog

    ron2

    I always miss the good stuff. By the time I made it back to this thread today, it's been edited. Oh well, que sera, sera.

     

    Me, too.  See, you don't really need a block function, all you need is a coupla good moderators. 

    • Gold Top Dog

    I prefer the block option and then threads wouldn't have to get edited so much... in theory anyway... 

    • Gold Top Dog

    Chuffy

    I prefer the block option and then threads wouldn't have to get edited so much... in theory anyway... 

     

     

     

    TOO True… except it wont work when new trolls come on and start crap with people Wink

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    There's risk no matter what we do. I just try to

    "Roll with the punches and get to what's real ...."

    from "Jump" by Van Halen.

     

    • Puppy

    **EDITED: Rude and Baiting behavior**

    • Puppy

    Content removed...member banned 

     

    LC/TSST...AREN'T YOU TIRED OF THIS GAME YET????

     

    edited by Jaime 02/04/2008

     

    • Puppy

    *content removed*

    • Gold Top Dog

    Dewie, chewie Louy...Which one are you today???? LC/osk/tsst...still the games continue...wonder how we know...it's obvious

    chewie 2008-02-05 17:17:01.083                128.152.20.33osk76    2008-02-05 15:34:35.310                128.152.20.33osk76    2008-02-05 13:34:23.567                128.152.20.33sheppie  2008-02-05 12:13:14.460                128.152.20.33

    tssst       2008-02-04 16:17:02.480                128.152.20.33

    Banned again
    • Puppy
    EDITED BY BENEDICT - LC/tssst/Sheppie/Chewie/Dewie/osk76/Louy....this is really childish.
    • Gold Top Dog

    sounds like a duck...acts like a duck .....banned like a duck..

    Rules are rules, implimented accross the board...you requested your account closed..we did it...you've now created more login names and yes, against forum rules to have multiple accounts so you'll continue to be banned.

    They say age is just a number, I can see why! 

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Well, Jaime, I, for one, certainly appreciate your hard work.

    ETA: I just looked back and now I get it. The accounts, regardless of clever login id, are from the same ISP server.

    • Bronze

    At least I get paid a decent salary to work with oppositional and defiant disordered children.  Our motto is "Well that's why they're here". 

    To the mods....

     I tip my hat....

  •  

    • Gold Top Dog

    Chuffy
    So come on, speak up, what do you think?  Do you want a block function?

     

    I don't care one way or the other. I have never used it when it was available. I find it really quite easy to ignore posters that I don't want to read. I've never understood why others need technological help to do so. But I don't object to it, either.