...of cheating regarding the Cutest Dog competition. Now, many of us who entered don't really expect OUR dog to win, but we do expect that the dog that does win does so without benefit of cheating. I'm hearing reports of "hiding IP addresses" so that multiple votes can be cast. And, one cute puppy has amassed over 6,000 votes this week! Excuse me, but if one of the best known dogs on this forum has less than 50, what does that say? I'd be expecting vote totals in the hundreds maybe for a really cute pup, but most people vote for a dog that they know. I hope that dog.com will figure out whether cheating is going on, and, if so, will award the money to a dog that deserves it, not a dog that is being enriched by being dishonest. Comments?