Disclaimer thread.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Disclaimer thread.

    So here's my .02 cents...the disclaimer rule is rather difficult. I agree.

    I think that instead it should be solely at Mod/Admin discretion to allow, or not allow links posted in threads absent of any input from the original poster of the link. IOW removing it not or even adding a note ourselves should be at our discretion, and not subject to question or discussion.

    In particular spamming of links should not be allowed...and spamming described as "frequent posting of links sans any explanation or relevant input to the thread they are posted in".

    This obviously exempts people like Janet Rose who always post links with some sort of input....and Anne too who does the same...and includes people like espencer who often post NOTHING but the links because they themselves have not ever tried or used them.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Couldn't agree more, BUT, Anne needs to take the danged disclaimer out of her SIG.

    More sig games.....sigh

    • Gold Top Dog

    Ugh.  So we get complaints about people posting links that could be dangerous etc...and we counteract that...and they object to THAT?  

    I agree with your POV, Gina...what I am worried about is that espencer and others will go back to posting JUST links so we delete those, and then we are picking on them.  

    I need more coffee and to think about this.