Reform to protect pedigree dogs

    • Gold Top Dog

    riiiight....because overangulation and hair length...is MUCH worse than say...hertitable blindness, deafness, or crippling skin disease, etc.

    lipstick and rouge...they know the real issue is with the people...not words written on a page...but as we already know...people are hard to deal with, just go thru the motions and cover your behind legally.

    • Gold Top Dog

    I didn't even notice the thread title at first.  It honestly has me laughing "Reform to PROTECT..."  OK, well WHO has destroyed these dogs?  Who has promoted these stupid ring fads?  The AKC and the Kennel Club.  So now they are the heroes for "reforming" their own absurdities?  How about all the people who have been breeding correct, balanced German Shepherds, for example, since the inception of the breed and never paid any mind to what the AKC judges were putting up in the specialities?  Of course only those on the extreme ends of the spectrum get any press or recognition.  So they are going to change their own standard to penalize the overangulation that they have been promoting?  Good for them, I guess.

    • Gold Top Dog

    pudel

    They are focusing on physical traits that breeders are deliberately breeding for that are causing physical harm to the dog, just for the sake of appearance.  To me, this is animal cruelty.  A lot more important than genetic testing.

     

    Really? Because in my breed (Aussies), the issue we are having with conformation dogs tend to be things like more than moderate bone, and more than moderate coat, not enough working drive (no brain, all beauty).There are no crazy deformities to the skull or body. The only accepted bite has been a full, scissor bite, so that's not anything new.

    MDR-1 sensativity, juvinile cataracts, epilepsy, etc are far more serious than a rose pricked ear which may not be pretty, but doesn't affect the dog.

    I don't see these changes fixing anything for the vast majority of breeds listed.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Liesje

     Of course only those on the extreme ends of the spectrum get any press or recognition.

    Great point. 
    • Gold Top Dog

     This is what they want to change for labs "Characteristics, body."

    What is it about the lab's body/characteristics that causes physical harm to the dog?  If the dog is over weight, that causes harm, but that is not an inborn trait--that is a human issue.

    • Gold Top Dog

     Change the Chinese Crested's feet??? Ummm.... what's wrong  with a hare foot? Ena's  certainly don't bother her. How about change the standard so you can't Nair your Maltese and show it as a Crested?

     

    That list is utterly ridiculous, IMO. 

    • Gold Top Dog

    jennie_c_d

     Change the Chinese Crested's feet??? Ummm.... what's wrong  with a hare foot? Ena's  certainly don't bother her. How about change the standard so you can't Nair your Maltese and show it as a Crested?

     I suspect that Cresteds are going to lose True Hairless dogs at some point, at least in the show lines. On one hand it is hard to believe that Crested people are so short sighted as to give up one thing that makes their breed really unique (hairlessness) for a flashier show dog. On the other hand, the same thing has happened in other breeds with different traits.

    • Gold Top Dog

     And the wrinkly skin is pretty important, too. The hairy dogs don't have that trait. I don't know if they sweat or not. Ena certainly does!!! Just like a peopleWink

     

    It is really tragic to see the defining trait of any breed being lost.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Jennie, 

    I'm going to play devil's advocate here. Shouldn't we do away with the hairless Chinese Crested? They can get sunburned, or freeze, and isn't breeding for hairlessness just promoting a serious health issue. And my god, the dentition issues!

    The real problem as I see it, is that breeders give up too easily. The folks that love to show often breed to a show winner and slowly a breed changes. Average "lifespan" of a show breeder? Seven years! Then new people take their place in the sport. I started showing Dobermans in the late sixties, and looking back, the changes have been enormous! Now traits that were considered faults are everywhere, and I've even heard newbies praise the fault as being correct. Would CH. Galaxys Correy Missle Belle even be able to finish in today's ring?

    My grandmother was a cocker spaniel exhibitor in the 1930s. When the long, profuse coats started winning, she quit showing, and quit breeding. How can a judge not put up that incorrect coat when every dog has it? After all, a correct little cocker is under all that hair, and with a haircut he can go into the field and perform.

    Liesje, don't you think if a lot of the correct GSD were to start being exhibited at the AKC shows, that some may start to win, and the breed might begin to swing back to moderation? My own breed the BC is an example. Even though the standard is fairly well written and allows a huge variety of ""correct", when was the last time someone had a winning *** eared smooth? When was the last time one was entered? A judge can't put up something that's not in the ring.

    • Gold Top Dog

     

    jennie_cd
      And the wrinkly skin is pretty important, too.

     Important for what?

     

    dstull
    Shouldn't we do away with the hairless Chinese Crested? They can get sunburned, or freeze, and isn't breeding for hairlessness just promoting a serious health issue.

     Dogs have fur for a biological reason.  It's obvious that the lack of fur causes these poor dogs problems.  No dog should ever have to suffer from acne and sunburn for no other reason that just so people can have something that looks unique.  Why dont' we start making dogs without ears or toenails while were at it. 

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    dstull

    Liesje, don't you think if a lot of the correct GSD were to start being exhibited at the AKC shows, that some may start to win, and the breed might begin to swing back to moderation? ..... A judge can't put up something that's not in the ring.

     

    Why would I waste my time there though?  I have other issues with AKC-obsessed breeders beyond just the conformation of the dog.  I do not consider titles like CGC, TT, AKC herding, agility, rally, etc to be true breedworthiness tests.  There are already thriving conformation events where I feel much more comfortable (WDA and USA).  No, they are NOT perfect and have their own sets of political problems and interpretations of the standard, but at least a dog has to have a proper working title and certified hips before it can even be entered in the conformation class.  In the working dog class (age 2+) the dog has to first past stand for exam.  If there is any obvious fault (incorrect bite, missing teeth, undescended testicles, over/under size) the dog is done.  Next is the protection test which has a few exercising involving heeling, biting, outing.  If the dog does not pass this, again the dog is done.  The third phase is the actual conformation ring.  To even enter the show at this level the dog must have certain hip scores and acceptable titles. 

    The point is evaluating breeding stock, and good GSD breeders value balance.  A dog that has near perfect conformation and moves beautifully is not a balanced dog unless it has the correct temperament and drive to back it up.  The AKC doesn't have anything of the sorts to test this, and they even discourage or ban Schutzhund, the sport specifically developed FOR the German Shepherd dog.

    So no, I'm not going to waste a ton of my time and money trying to convince other people they are wrong.  If that's what they think a German shepherd should be then I guess that is their right.  I disagree but I would rather enter my dogs in events where they can excel and really be tested and developed into better dogs than try to prove a point somewhere else and never get anything done.

    • Gold Top Dog

    dstull

    Jennie, 

    I'm going to play devil's advocate here. Shouldn't we do away with the hairless Chinese Crested? They can get sunburned, or freeze, and isn't breeding for hairlessness just promoting a serious health issue. And my god, the dentition issues!

     With Hairless Cresteds, the true Hairless are historically correct. The "hairy Hairless" were created by show breeders. I admit, in the ring the hair Hairless are attractive little dogs with their excessive furnishing but they are not correct. Maybe it is just me but a breed that is supposed to be hairless shouln't have to be shaved and Naired to be taken in the ring.

    dstull
    Liesje, don't you think if a lot of the correct GSD were to start being exhibited at the AKC shows, that some may start to win, and the breed might begin to swing back to moderation? My own breed the BC is an example. Even though the standard is fairly well written and allows a huge variety of ""correct", when was the last time someone had a winning *** eared smooth? When was the last time one was entered? A judge can't put up something that's not in the ring.

      Not Liesje but am somone who has owned both correct GSDs and Amline GSDs. I don't think you are seeing the entire problem here or you may realize that it is not that easy to just change it. People do occasionally try to compete with their German line GSDs in AKC. A handful over the years have even managed to finish German line GSDs but more often than not, owners give up after having spent a lot of money and getting no where. You have to take into account Judges Eduaction, which is where judges learn what they are looking for in a breed, what is correct and what is most important. Who does Judges Ed? Show breeders do :)

     I know at one Judges Ed I was at, future Collie breeders were told that the head should be 70-75% of what they base their placements and points on and that if they have a choice between a dog with an outstanding head and a dog with outstanding structure, the dog with the better head should win. Future GSD judges are told that for a GSD side movement is the very most important thing in the breed. They are told that the long leg rear leg bones and excessive rear angulation are how GSDs are supposed to look. So the problem really starts with the breeder and moves to Judges Ed. It is made worse by the future and new judges seeing ads and big winning GSDs that are all typical Amline GSDs.

     The other issue in the competive breeds such as GSDs and Dobes is that they are very much a handler breed. Very few are owner handled to their CH, even fewer are owner handled by "nobodys" and most unlikely would be an "nobody" owner handler finishing a German line GSD. So to even be looked at in the GSD ring, you pretty much have to hire a professional handler. That will be at least an extra $75 per show, more if your dog wins. Along with entry fees, you are looking at $100/day to even compete with a GSD. And even at that, the fact is when your dog is the only different looking dog in the ring, or one of just a handful of different looking dogs even your dog will be passed up more often than not.

      Most judges don't want to rock the boat so to speak. A judge putting up a German line dog, especially repeatedly will find themselves with fewer and fewer assignments and fewer and fewer entries. Which means, once a judge is established as someone who puts up the wrong type people will stop entering dogs under that judfe. If people stop entering dogs, there are no points for the few who do show up which makes finishing a German line GSD even harder. To get a major in my area your dog needs to beat at least 11 other dogs (or 15 other bitches).

     In breeds which are less common and less competive (fewer numbers, few to no professional handlers, no a competive Group breed), you will see a variety of different looks winning in the ring. The more competive the breed is, the more you see the same basic look winning over and over. Also the more competive a breed, the more money there is involved in showing and specialing them. Breeders, handlers and owners of Amline GSDs are not just going to go away with their dogs, as they have too much invested in the breed.

     Your breed, as you should know quickly become one of those competive show breeds in AKC. When they were first recognized all sorts of people finished their BCs easily - BCs of all different types. But guess what I see at Judges Ed every time I go (BCs always seem to be the same day as us) - typical heavy coated, perfectly marked, tipped eared, round headed show BCs. I suspect that the reason you don't see smooths in the AKC ring is that all the show BCs are pretty much New Zealand/Australian lines and it doesn't seem as though those BCs carry the Smooth gene. Most every smooth I have seen has been a working bred dog, with woking type structure - very different from what wins in AKC.

     And for GSDs (and I suspect BCs) the truth is that AKC conformation is just not that important to people with the correct, working dogs. Certainly not important enough to invest $100/day for two to four day weekends throughout the year. German line GSD people have their own conformation shows which are judged by GSD breeders (often judges from Europe), have written critiques and show ratings. Those shows are a more meaningful way for them to have their dogs evaluated than AKC shows where the breed is no longer correct even to their own standard and most judges have never even owned a GSD. With GSDs, the Amline GSDs really don't have an impact on what German line breeders are doing or their dogs. Some Amline people outcross to German lines but German line people don't breed to Amlines, as there is nothing that Amlines can offer the German dogs structure or temperament wise.

     I always tell people the AKC GSD scene is like the story of The Emperor's New Clothes - people outside of the breed, even other dog people often comment that the dogs look "crippled", "walk on their hocks", or that their "movement looks painful" and it is easy to see that they are not really what GSDs are meant to look like. But within the breed those dogs are considered "correct",  "beautiful" and are Champions. Newbies to the AKC GSD Scene often start off disliking the extreme looking dogs and often start with a more moderate dog to show. But if they stay involved and want to be competive, they will sooner or later own a typical Amline GSD after seeing them win and being told by everyone how correct they are. And if they stay involved long enough, those people will breed typical Amline GSDs and educate others as to what is correct for the breed...

    • Gold Top Dog

    AgileGSD

    I don't think you are seeing the entire problem here or you may realize that it is not that easy to just change it. People do occasionally try to compete with their German line GSDs in AKC. A handful over the years have even managed to finish German line GSDs but more often than not, owners give up after having spent a lot of money and getting no where. You have to take into account Judges Eduaction, which is where judges learn what they are looking for in a breed, what is correct and what is most important. Who does Judges Ed? Show breeders do :)

     

    Exactly.

    I entered Nikon in an AKC puppy show two weekends ago.  The judges were not "official" yet, but using the event as part of their training.  On one hand this was good because they took quite a bit of time looking at each dog, it was really good practice, at least for me being new to handling and for Nikon being 4 months old.

    At this show, you could enter twice, for practice.  All the people I went with entered twice.  Since we were the only ones that did (there were 5 of us), when they did the second "show" they just did all the classes at once since it didn't count for ribbons anyway.  We all went in and my breeder was handling one of her dogs and remarked that this was the "German" class.  The judge giggled and then walked over to the breeder and asked her what she meant.  We all kind looked back and forth at each other.  My breeder was like "wellllll, these dogs were all German bred, and the other dogs are American line dogs" to which the judge responded "OH, I *thought* these looked different!"  and my breeder responds "yeah and you like the American ones because that is what you've been putting up".  Honest to God the JUDGE was not aware of differences in type.  She made some comments about the differences in angulation (the American puppies there were NOT at all moderate they were rather extreme in type), the dogs moving on their hocks, etc and we're all like DUH.  And this is the future of AKC judging?  Then the judge pretended to know what she was talking about which is funny, since my breeder actually bred and exhibited Am line GSDs for nearly 30 years before switching over to German type.  Her male was the top winning AKC GSD in 1999 (here he is, pretty moderate for an Am line I think: http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/pictures/533102.jpg) and now she owns a female who was Herding Siegrin at the big Sieger show in Germany and is 12 times HGH, so she knows the breed from both sides of the fence, so to speak.

    At Nikon's first show, a UKC show, a bunch of Am line people showed up.  We were waiting our turn and I saw this puppy about Nikon's age go by and I swear, my first reaction was that this dog had a neurological disorder!  He was very cowhocked, so angulated he looked like he was sagging, he was walking on his hocks and dragging his feet as he walked.  I have seen GSDs with dysplasia that appear to move more correctly and fluidly than this puppy.

    Again, I don't really care either way that these dogs and this fancy exists.  The only problem I really have is that THAT is what people think a good, purebred GSD actually looks like.  Um, no.  This is Aceofnike van het Bleekhof, vice Sieger of the 2008 world championships (I cannot find a picture of the winner).  Below Nike is 2008 BSP winner Javir vom Talka Marda.  Those are world class German shepherd dogs.  Their owners/handlers probably couldn't care less about the AKC and their "events", who knows if these dogs are even AKC registered.


    • Gold Top Dog

    dstull
    I'm going to play devil's advocate here. Shouldn't we do away with the hairless Chinese Crested? They can get sunburned, or freeze, and isn't breeding for hairlessness just promoting a serious health issue. And my god, the dentition issues!

     

     

    The Chinese Crested is a very primitive breed. It developed waaay before most of the breeds we have. In it's  proper form, it is pretty hardy. My true hairless Crested has wrinkled, dark colored skin. My Parson Russell Terrier, who has an incorrect, soft, super thick, double coat, has been sunburned MANY times. My Crested was sunburned, once, as a puppy, when her previous owner left her outdoors with no shelter. And she has a gorgeous mouth. Breeding carefully can create that.

     

    If we do get rid of the Crested (which breeds easily and whelps large litters on it's own), we'll have to get rid of the myriad other breeds that  have far, far worse issues than they do.

    • Gold Top Dog

    pudel

     

    jennie_cd
      And the wrinkly skin is pretty important, too.

     Important for what?

     

     

    Skin toughness. I'm guessing you've not spent much time with Cresteds. They've been around for centuries. They're tough as nails. The hairy shavedowns are NOT, but that's because they have a full coat that's been shaved off, and their skin is in a state of irritation.