Chicago Animal Shelter Nears 'No-Kill' Status

    • Gold Top Dog

    Chicago Animal Shelter Nears 'No-Kill' Status

    2007 Chicago Animal Shelter Alliance
    Admissions, Euthanasia Rates Plunge
     

    Success Contradicts Push For Forced Spay/Neuter Law

    As Chicago Almost Arrives At Coveted ‘No-Kill’ Status 
    by JOHN YATES
    American Sporting Dog Alliance
     
    CHICAGO – The most recent data from Chicago animal shelters shows unparalleled success in lowering admissions and reducing euthanasia rates. Admission rates plunged 4.5-percent and it is probable that no healthy and adoptable dogs had to be euthanized in 2007.
     
    Chicago animal shelters are literally knocking on the door of coveted “no-kill” status, which means that no adoptable, healthy or treatable dogs and cats are euthanized. At its current rate of progress, “no-kill” will be a reality in Chicago within two years for both dogs and cats.
     
    A statistical analysis of the past 12 years shows that Chicago has one of the very best sheltering systems in America. The city’s success at reducing the number of unwanted dogs and finding homes for adoptable dogs has been truly noteworthy. No city in America has shown better results.
     
    American Sporting Dog Alliance researchers Margo Milde and Michele Smith obtained official Chicago Animal Shelter Alliance (CASA) statistics for 2007. This information has not been published in Chicago or placed on local sheltering websites. Nor has it been made available to City Council, which is considering a tough ordinance to force people to spay or neuter their pets.
     
    Animal rights groups and aldermen pushing for this ordinance have been spreading disinformation about shelter statistics in order to create the false appearance of a crisis.
     
    The official report tells the truth about the statistics.
     
    The CASA data for 2007 shows a one-year drop in shelter admission rates of 5-percent in the City of Chicago, and an 18-percent drop in the number of cats and dogs that had to be euthanized.
     
    For dogs only, there was an 8.4-percent decline in shelter admissions and a 17-percent decline in the number of dogs that had to be euthanized, the 2007 data shows.
     
    But the best news is that only 445 healthy dogs had to be euthanized in Chicago last year, compared to 736 in 2006. Most if not all of these dogs were euthanized because they had serious temperament problems, such as aggression toward people or other animals, or other severe behavioral problems. Many of them were brought to the shelter by their owners specifically to be euthanized for these reasons.
     
    All of the other dogs that were euthanized were unhealthy due to advanced age, illness or injury, the data shows. Some of them had conditions that could be treated or managed, but the vast majority of these dogs were listed as untreatable.
     
    Thus, for all practical purposes, it is fair to say that no healthy and adoptable dogs were euthanized in the City of Chicago last year.
     
    It doesn’t get much better than that!
     
    One of the stated reasons for the forced pet sterilization ordinance that is before City Council now is an alleged over-population of pets in Chicago. The shelter data completely refutes this allegation.
     
    The animal sheltering system in Chicago consists of large operations run by Animal Control, the Anti-Cruelty Society and the Animal Welfare League, backed by smaller organizations such as Chicago Canine Rescue, Felines, Harmony House, Lakeshore, PAWS and Treehouse. These city-based groups form CASA, and their statistics are the basis for the 2007 report. They also work closely with several other shelters and rescue groups in the metro area. These non-CASA programs bring dogs into the city shelter system to be euthanized, and also rescue dogs from the large shelters that are easily adoptable.
     
    CASA’s success can be attributed to aggressive public education programs, rescue work, foster care, adoptions and subsidized low-cost voluntary pet sterilization. Nationwide, a reported 60-percent of all dogs are spayed or neutered. Other sources peg this number at as high as 75-percent.
     
    These sheltering organizations not only find homes for almost every healthy and adoptable dog in the Chicago metro area, but also rescue thousands of dogs every year from natural disasters like Hurricane Katrina, overcrowded animal shelters in the southern states, and dogs seized from “puppy mills” that have been shut down by the law.
     The extent of this “humane relocation” effort is huge. Every Interstate highway has one or more rescue message boards to coordinate transportation for these dogs, and several other websites are devoted solely to this purpose. For example, the I-65 message board lists 3,742 postings to arrange transportation of dogs heading toward Chicago. Here are some of the highlights of the 2007 CASA report: 
    • Shelter admissions of cats and dogs dropped from 42,479 in 2006, to 40,555 in 2007 – a 4.5-percent decline. For dogs only, the drop was from 19,544 to 17,904, or 8.4-percent.
     
    • New homes were found for 11,460 cats and dogs in 2007, compared to 11,378 in 2006. For dogs only, adoptions increased from 5,088 in 2006 to 5,113 in 2007, which is almost miraculous considering that 8.4-percent fewer dogs entered the shelter system.
     
    • In 2006, 30-percent of the dogs that entered the shelter system found new adoptive homes. This rose to 34-percent in 2007, for a 4-percent increase. Cat adoptions increased by .3-percent.
     
    • In 2007, 1,107 dogs were reunited with their owners in the shelters. This compared to 1,118 in 2006.
     
    • Of the 6,290 dogs that were euthanized in 2007, 5,041 had to be killed because of untreatable serious medical problems. The report shows that 1,054 dogs were brought by their owners specifically for euthanasia.
     
    • The number of dogs euthanized fell from 8,820 in 2006 to 6,290 in 2006, a 17-percent decline.
     

    The numbers contained in the 2007 report clearly state the continued success of the Chicago sheltering program, and there is no other way to describe that success except to call it phenomenal.

     
    This is nothing new for Chicago. Between 2003 and 2005, the citywide euthanasia rate dropped 12% and shelter admissions fell by 11-percent.
     
    In 1996, 42,561 animals were euthanized in Chicago. The 2007 total of 18,969 shelter deaths is an incredible 79-percent decline since 1996.
     
    The proposed Chicago ordinance is supported by the Humane Society of the United States and other radical animal rights groups. These groups allege that an over-population of pets justifies mandatory pet sterilization.
     
    The facts in the CASA report put the HSUS rationale in its true perspective, which is part of the organization’s long-range plan to eliminate animal ownership in America.
     
    Simply put, HSUS is lying.
     
    HSUS and other groups are spreading disinformation in an attempt to pressure City Council to pass an ordinance that would have murderous consequences for animals and harm the lives of many fanciers of high quality purebred dogs and thousands of dog owners.
     
    The data shows clearly that there are not enough adoptable pets in Chicago to meet consumer demand. Virtually every adoptable dog finds a new home. Thousands of dogs are imported from other parts of the country every year, and some are brought in from foreign countries.
     
    The proposed ordinance requires spaying or neutering for all but a few cats and dogs, such as those used for shows, competition or breeding. The license fee for intact dogs and cats is set at $100 a year for each animal.
     
    Moreover, to qualify for any exemption, the applicant must submit to criminal background checks for every family member.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance urges all Chicago and metro dog owners to take an active role in our efforts to defeat this proposed ordinance.
     Please contact local organizers to coordinate your participation and plug into what we are doing. They are Karen Perry (ouilmette4@sbcglobal.net), Margo Milde (mrm1206@yahoo.com) and Michele Smith (msmith@cmscrescue.com). It is very important for dog owners to contact City Council members before the next committee meeting in September. The assemblymen must know the truth about city shelter statistics, if we are to defeat the HSUS campaign of lies, disinformation and distortion. This ordinance can be stopped if strong opposition arises from every neighborhood in Chicago, and from all segments of the dog community. Letters sent to the aldermen by surface mail are the most effective, followed by faxes and phone calls. Emails are the least effective. Even if they are brief, personal letters are much more effective than form letters. Here is a link to the web pages of each of the aldermen, where you will find contact information: http://egov.cityofchicago.org/city/webportal/portalProgramAction.do?programId=536879154&channelId=-536879035&topChannelName=Government. Here is a link to City Council Committees: http://www.chicityclerk.com/standingcommettee.php. Tuesday’s meeting will involve both the Committee on Finance and the Committee on License and Consumer Protection. This web page gives links to each committee member. Also, please contact your friends and members and officers of any clubs or organizations you belong to that can help. These include dog clubs, sportsmen’s clubs, farmers’ groups and firearms rights organizations. Hunters, farmers and firearms enthusiasts know that these kinds of laws stem from animal rights groups that also want to eliminate hunting, raising animals for food and the right to keep and bear arms. In addition, please join a dog owners’ rights advocacy organization that reflects your personal concerns and priorities. 
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, hobby breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life. Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org or contact us at asda@csonline.net.
     The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by the donations of our members, and maintain strict independence.  

    PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT

     
    • Gold Top Dog

    I guess I am not understanding your post.  Your argument states that CASA is doing what needs to be done and the ordinances are unnecessary.  But CASA took part in devleoping the ordinance.  I looked at their websites and Paws-Chicago seems to be in favor of the ordinance.  I wonder if CASA as one umbrella organization favors the ordinance.

    Anyway, here is an Associated Press article from 2006 which help balance the American Sporting Dog Alliance view.

    http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=resources&id=4398284

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Hi:

    You are seeing the trees, but not the forest.

     The main force behind thew new ordinance is PAWS, not CASA. The CASA board is not in favor of the ordinance. However, PAWS has essewntially taken over the CASA board, by virtue of the political clout of its founder. Many of the individual organizations in CASA are completely opposed to the ordinance, as are most (if not all) of the breed rescues in Chicago.

    Ms. Paula Fasseas, founder of PAWS, is closely alligned with HSUS.

    The PAWS program does little to help dogs in Chicago. It's shelter cost a reported $9 million to build, and houses only 70 dogs and cats. Each animal has it's own room, and I am NOT exaggerating. It is a very wealthy organization...crystal chandeliers in the lobby, auctioning $22,000 diamond brooches at fundraisers, bringing in movie stars and rock stars.

    Typical HSUS.

    Animal rights is this year's cause celebrete for the wealthy elite.

    But these people are completely out of touch with the rest of us. 

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    I looked at each of CASA member's website and only Paws Chicago states their position front and center.  CASA and the other members are silent.  Please reference how you obtained their position.

    Yes, Paws Chicago recently built a 6 million dollar cageless facility in the affluent area on the north side of Chicago.  Chicago Paw claims they are behind the accomplishments you mentioned of Chicago attainng the goal of being a no-kill city. 

    • Gold Top Dog

    PAWS likes to brag.

    PAWS shelters only 70 animals. How could they possibly be responsible for helping the thousands of animals the other groups find homes for. If you look at the Chicago shelter statistics, anything tht PAWS does is a tiny percentage.

    My knowledge of the CASA split comes from people I work closely with who are part of this organization.

    You also will find public statements by some of them on the Illinois pet law message board.

    You very obviously are speaking from an animal rights perspective. I smell HSUS and PAWS on your posts.

    You know you cannot crticise the facts in my report. Thus, you take potshots at the side issues. And you're wrong about those, too, such as PAWS.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Have you seen a Eyes, Ears, and Nose Specialist for the problem you are having with your smells?

    I am dog owner, connected with a rescue organization, and I take in multiple shelter dogs at one time, rehab, train, and then place.  I am familiar with each of the members of CASA and have called many a times for advise.  I also see them at various adoption events in the Chicago area. 

    I am looking for facts, not slanted fact.  If you can't show CASA or its indiviidual member public position on the ordinance then your facts turn into made up information. 

    BTW, I did like how you tried to slant Bob Barker's testimony by implying he was against the ordinance.  He is in favor of the ordinance.and the evidence is in his public statement and testimony.

    Do you know by slanting the facts, you push people away from the issue or force them to take your opposing side.  You may want to rethink your strategy.

    Oh yeah, I have called the HSUS on dog issues and they are most helpful.  But my experience is they always start off with, "this is off the record".

    • Gold Top Dog

    I think you need to take a class in remedial reading.

    I clearly identified Bob Barker as in favor of the ordinance. He is a TV celebrity...some qualification!

    If you want to criticise my opinions, why don't you do so? Why don';t you debate the facts I present instead of concocting innuendoes?

    You are not looking at facts. You are looking at websites. If you want to talk facts, show me that you have some. You don't.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    The question to you is still on the table, unanswered.  Show the references or links of public statements made by CASA or its members that state they are not in favor of the ordinance.  Then your claim would be a fact.  The only one I found was in the PAWS Chicago site http://www.pawschicago.org/  This is a fact, PAWS Chicago is in favor of the ordinance.  PAWS Chicago is a member of CASA.

    • Gold Top Dog

    eaglerock814

    I clearly identified Bob Barker as in favor of the ordinance. He is a TV celebrity...some qualification!

    Again, I must ask you to reference where you clearly identified Bob Barker as in favor of the ordinance.  The article implied because of Barker's association but there definitely was no clear statement.  Now, I did in this statement

    "I heard on the radio that Bob Barker of Price is Right fame is going to speak at the city council meeting in favor of the ordinance."

    But I just can find any evidence of your claim.  Is this some more made up information?

    • Gold Top Dog

    Firstly, out of curiosity how many pounds/shelters are there in Chicago including the surrounding rather extensive residential areas. Is there a 'waiting list' to get into no-kill-shelters, if so where are they waiting. Also just a thought, are more people now taking unwanted pets to private vets to get put down at the vet clinics, consequently these will not appear on any pound/shelter kill statistics.
     
    About Bob Barker, the following from this link and also there is news video at that link:-
    http://cbs2chicago.com/local/bob.barker.pets.2.783053.html
     
    CBS2 Chicago
    Jul 29, 2008
    Bob Barker Lobbies Council For Pet Neutering Law
    Barker Says The Movement Is Sweeping The Country
    Reporting Vince Gerasole
     
    CHICAGO (CBS) ― Former "Price Is Right" host Bob Barker was in Chicago Tuesday, talking to city council about the importance of getting pets spayed and neutered. CBS 2's Vince Gerasole reports, it could become mandatory here in Chicago.
     
    Many of the animals waiting for a home at the no-kill Paws Chicago center are rescued strays. Directors say it is evidence that in a city with significant free and low cost spaying and neutering programs, pet overpopulation remains a significant problem.
     
    "We still have tens of thousands of animals coming in and being euthanized because there are not enough homes for them," according to Rochelle Michalek of PAWS Chicago.
     
    Chicago's Animal Care and Control is charged with tackling the problem. Last year it collected nearly 13,300 stray dogs and cats. Euthanizing them cost taxpayers an estimated 2.3 million dollars
     
    In Chicago Tuesday, former "Price Is Right" host Bob Barker helped make controlling the pet population a national cause.
     
    Barker, known for always ending his show by saying, "Have your pets spayed and neutered," was greeted with a standing ovation at Chicago City Hall. He was there testifying in favor of a new ordinance requiring population control for Chicago's cats and dogs.
     
    Barker says the movement for spaying and neuter legislation is sweeping this country
     
    "Something has to be done. It's leading to just reprehensible animal suffering and it's costing a fortune for the taxpayers," Barker said.
     
    Proponents also claim that spaying and neutering pets reduces dog aggression and would help to police the use of animals in illegal dog fights. But some worry the measure is unenforceable and even Chicago's Veterinary Medical Association stands in opposition, saying the measure can't force the irresponsible to take responsibility.
     
    Dr. Jerry Klein, a veterinarian, said "I think this ordinance is geared to a certain social and economic group that doesn't follow the laws now."
     
    And Alderman Bob Fioretti said "We can't enforce the licensing of our dogs in the city. I am concerned about whether we can start enforcing the neutering.
     
    First time offenders would receive just a notice, but fines would jump to 100 dollars for a second offense and 500 dollars for a third offense. There would also be exemptions for breeders and show dogs. After four hours today, more than 80 people were still waiting to testify. Additional hearings are being scheduled before the matter comes up for a vote.
    .

    • Gold Top Dog

    It seems that all of your reports are full of wrong information. It is not even worth going thru each one of your reports to prove otherwise. I personally and I'm sure many others as well, do not have the time. You've just flooded the internet with your info and I'm sure this is exactly what you are banking on, is that people won't have the time to prove all of the reports wrong, since there are so many on so many forums. Then others will read them and take what you said as truth. You've also flooded the internet, in order that anyone tries to find out anything about you and your organization, other than what you yourself have written, it is almost impossible. Glad to know that you are so desperate in your attempts.

    • Gold Top Dog

    DPU

    The question to you is still on the table, unanswered.  Show the references or links of public statements made by CASA or its members that state they are not in favor of the ordinance.  Then your claim would be a fact.  The only one I found was in the PAWS Chicago site http://www.pawschicago.org/  This is a fact, PAWS Chicago is in favor of the ordinance.  PAWS Chicago is a member of CASA.

    The above quote is still outstanding and needs to be addressed in order for you guys to have any creditability at all.

    The post by Quincy? I could not make heads or tails whatsoever.  You come to this forum saying Chicago is solving its own problem with regards to its euthanasia rate and there is no need for city ordinances.  You say CASA is not for the ordinance but can not provide any evidence of their position, for or against.  Frankly, I just think you are confusing people and hurting your cause which I do not understand what it is.

    If Chicago achieves its no-kill city status then how do you think that was accomplished.  By rescue group like me.  First and foremost, involvement and volunteers like myself, second education, third spay/neuter policy.  I think the Chicago government wants to accomplish the no-kill city status by putting a little bite on the spay/neuter policy.  They surely can not accomplish it on their own and I believe their involvement will have little impact overall.

    • Gold Top Dog

    I agree, Maureen.

     

    And... I'm not sure what the problem if that shelter goes no-kill. I for one - Think that's great! So what that they are smaller! It's one group making a step in the right direction. Countless pets are euthanised in shelters DAILY, so kudos to the ones making the effort to stop this. I personally work for a no kill shelter - and no. It's not easy, but it's worth it (to me) to be putting so many wonderful pets to sleep because there are no homes for them.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Quincy

    Firstly, out of curiosity how many pounds/shelters are there in Chicago including the surrounding rather extensive residential areas. Is there a 'waiting list' to get into no-kill-shelters, if so where are they waiting. Also just a thought, are more people now taking unwanted pets to private vets to get put down at the vet clinics, consequently these will not appear on any pound/shelter kill statistics.

    It is absolutely remarkable what municipal employee, shelter employees, and shelter volunteers are doing to the SAVE THEM ALL.  One needs to be involved to see what is happening.  I can tell you many stories but the one I think you will get is the shuffle board game.  Shelter facilities who have policies and time limits working together, passing the dogs amongst themselves, giving them more time and another chance at life.  One of my fosters waited eight months before coming to my home, being swapped amongs 3 different shelters.  This dog was peg to come to my home because of his special need and when I learned of him being on a "waiting list", there surely was corner here that he would be happy to take. 

    I stated on this forum a while back that if the Dog Professionals would stop bickering amongs themselves and organize and select someone to lead them, they could fix the shelter dog problem overnight.  If they didn't there is group growing in number, speaking louder, and making things happen....and that group is the Shelter Volunteers.  I also stated the Volunteers' solutions would not be liked by the dog professional and it seems to be true.  So Mr. Opposite of Animal Rights, what solutions do you offer if you can't accept what is in the ordinance.  The ordinance is just a piece of paper that can be overturned.  Remember Chicago's Foie Gras story, banned by law but then reverse a while later.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    DPU

    The post by Quincy? I could not make heads or tails whatsoever.  You come to this forum saying Chicago is solving its own problem with regards to its euthanasia rate and there is no need for city ordinances.  You say CASA is not for the ordinance but can not provide any evidence of their position, for or against.  Frankly, I just think you are confusing people and hurting your cause which I do not understand what it is.

    Maybe you could not make heads or tails might be because you are mixed up in who posted what, please show me where I posted anything in relation to the above.