willowchow
Posted : 6/10/2006 10:41:38 PM
OK, first of all, she went an erased some of what was posted which is going to make anyone who looks at this now not understand what's being discussed.
You cannot use appearances to determine if a dog is "approachable", I believe that was the word used. She stated she thought she could and that on other forums they use looks to decide such a thing.
Another forum I belong to is run by a very well known (and respected trainer) and moderated by several other trainers/behaviorists. One of the frequent topics is looking at a picture and trying to assess a little about the dog's personality. Yes online, on a forum.
THAT's what Glenda was refering to as "misinformation", stating that you can use looks to determine such a thing. (NOT her opinion of Willow)
To further back up my agreement of that, I tried to explain the facial expressions of Willow in the pictures and how she was misreading them, but that sort of got ignored.
Basically, we don't want people looking at a dog, thinking by the facial expression that it is friendly and go up to it. I'm NOT saying they are going to HUG it, but believe me, I've had a few people do things NOT that far off. You cannot assume people have common sense, they don't! People do not know how to approach or pet a dog for the most part, do you know how many people go straight for her head?? Also, this works the other way around, we don't want someone to look at my pictures or any breed pictures and say, that dog "looks" mean. Again, they don't read the expression right, my avatar picture, she's smiling, she's outside and having fun. But, I've had people at work look at that very photo and say she looks mean.
Whatever, either way, why are you stepping in and defending her?? I believe she is perfectly capable of speaking for herself and has choosen not to.