miranadobe
Posted : 5/16/2006 5:55:50 PM
I think you're sort of on the right track - I think proportionally, there are probably more black dogs in shelters, period. More lab/shepherd/whatever mixes that are "black" and maybe bigger. Means more left behind. Go troll through your local shelter one day and count the dogs of each color (and try to classify which color category you would put, say, a shepherd mix in... Is he black? Brown? Tan? What about that big splotch of white down his chest and stomach?).
I wonder (and honestly doubt) if all shelters are tracking the colors of their dogs ("accurately"). Those that are may have noticed a trend and are now counting, trying to put data behind it. That data is what news articles refer to, because it's available. But I wonder if its a complete representation of the nation.
To me I equate it to dog bite counts. I know more people who've been bitten by Cocker Spaniels, Golden Retrievers, etc and never reported the bite. (By the way, I love both breeds, so no offense to either is intended. Just that their reputation tends toward great family dog, not insurance risk.) Yet, someone bitten by a Doberman or other breed might be quicker to report it - thus skewing the statistics of dog bites that insurance companies use to say, "Well, that breed has a really high rate of dog bite incidents." Yeah, REPORTED dog bites. Not really a complete picture.