Parvo Claims Oprah's Rescue Puppy

    • Gold Top Dog

    Parvo Claims Oprah's Rescue Puppy

    Oprah’s Puppy Dies Of Parvovirus

     

    Came From Extremist Chicago Animal Rights Shelter

     
    by JOHN YATES
    American Sporting Dog Alliance
     This article is archived at: http://eaglerock814.proboards107.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=29  
    CHICAGO (March 13, 2009) – Paula Fasseas might have some explaining to do.
     Yesterday, Fasseas testified before Chicago City Council and claimed that veterinarians who oppose a spay/neuter mandate are greedy. She said the veterinarians care only about protecting their business interests. Both the city and state veterinary medical associations have opposed the mandate because it enables government to make medical decisions for a pet that should be made only by medical professionals. 
    Her testimony came only hours before tragedy struck the home of talk show superstar Oprah Winfrey, who adopted two puppies from the Pets Are Worth Saving (PAWS) animal shelter that is operated by Fasseas. An outspoken disciple of the radical Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), Fasseas founded the PAWS program and remains chairman of its board.
     
    Winfrey lost one of those puppies to dreaded parvovirus, which apparently was contacted while it was living at the PAWS shelter, the American Sporting Dog Alliance (ASDA) has learned. In addition, PAWS shelter staff took some of the puppy’s littermates to the Oprah Show, and a beloved puppy previously obtained by Winfrey was exposed to the deadly disease and now shows symptoms of it.
     
    Winfrey reportedly is fighting now to save the second puppy’s life. Emergency clinic veterinarians, whom Fasseas accused of being greedy, have fought round the clock to help Winfrey to try to save the two puppies.
     
    PAWS recently completed a luxurious $9 million shelter to house only 20-plus animals in separate rooms, tour guides report. Crystal chandeliers adorn the lobby, and fund-raisers are diamond-studded black-tie affairs. It’s a pretty cushy set-up, and the PAWS board has been very successful in attracting large donations from wealthy people and companies. PAWS is known for taking the most desirable and easily adoptable dogs from local animal shelters, and then putting them up for adoption. So-called donations to purchase a puppy from PAWS reportedly range upward from $200.
     
    Unfortunately, the PAWS staff and Fasseas apparently haven’t learned the basics of disease management and prevention in an animal shelter with a constant turnover of dogs from many different sources, and the puppies and Winfrey have paid the price.
     
    It also is ironic that Fasseas has been critical of private breeders, commercial kennels and pet stores for allegedly selling many puppies that are seriously ill. Fasseas echoes animal rights movement propaganda that people who raise dogs sacrifice their dogs’ health for money and profit.
     
    It is tragically ironic that Winfrey also has adopted this HSUS stance, and a special report she aired last year on “puppy mills” pointed to the disease allegations and touted rescue programs as a preferred alternative. Winfrey also accepted the 2009 “Person of the Year” award from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which is one of America’s most radical animal rights groups.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance has documented the trail of the sick puppies to Winfrey’s doorstep. This is the way the story unfolded.
     
    Angela M. Brown, a Chicago woman who is active in the rescue movement, obtained an American cocker spaniel bitch from a relative in South Carolina. The dog was in poor shape, and Brown soon realized that the dog was pregnant.
     
    Weeks later, eleven puppies were born. Brown took great care of the bitch and her puppies, and appears to have done everything right. One of the puppies died at a vey young age, three were adopted to private parties, and seven were relinquished to the PAWS shelter “in mid February when they were 9 weeks old,” according to the rescuer’s website.
     
    Winfrey obtained one of those puppies from the PAWS shelter. She named the precious female puppy “Sadie,” and introduced her on the Oprah Show. Sadie apparently did not have parvovirus, but Winfrey reported that she was up all night with the puppy the day after she obtained it from the PAWS shelter. She said the puppy had “a little virus.”
     
    Winfrey fell in love with Sadie and asked to adopt a second puppy, which was a male named Ivan. Ivan and some of his littermates appeared on the Oprah Show on March 6.
     
    But Ivan came down with a serious illness at some point after Winfrey took him home, and she rushed him to an emergency veterinary clinic. Ivan was diagnosed with parvovirus and died last night. The disease is most often fatal to young puppies, which are very susceptible if they are exposed to it. Parvovirus is highly contagious and is spread very easily.
     
    Based on the dates when the puppies were relinquished to PAWS and the appearance of the remaining littermates on the Oprah Show, it would appear that the puppies were exposed to parvovirus at the PAWS shelter. They would have clearly been at the PAWS shelter during the incubation period for the deadly disease.
     
    During this period, PAWS personnel brought some remaining littermates to the Oprah Show for exposure to a national audience. As it turned out, at least some of the remaining littermates were infected with parvovirus. The infected puppies also came into contact with other guests on the show, and possibly with show staff members and people in the audience.
     
    Winfrey’s beloved Sadie also was exposed to the litter on the TV show, and reportedly came down with the disease. Sadie’s fate remains uncertain.
     
    It is not known if any of the puppies were vaccinated against parvovirus at the PAWS shelter, or if they were isolated from the general population of dogs. These are standard disease prevention and management practices for young puppies with undeveloped immune systems.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance offers our prayers for the speedy and full recovery of Sadie, and also for the continuation of the fine work done by many Chicago rescue and sheltering programs, which are among the finest in the nation. Our hearts go out to Winfrey.
     Here is an example of the animal rights movement propaganda that is published on the PAWS website: “Inhumane ‘backyard breeders’ have found a profit-center in exploiting pets that are often used in dogfighting, other illegal activities or simply given up when no longer wanted…Many backyard breeders keep pets in inhumane conditions and are not registered or inspected. This ordinance will require registration of breeders and a mechanism to monitor that breeders engage in safe and humane practices.” We have found that people who live in glass houses should be careful about throwing stones. 
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We also welcome people who work with other breeds, as legislative issues affect all of us. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by your donations in order to maintain strict independence.
     
    Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org . Our email is asda@csonline.net .
     
    PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS
     

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Everything this poster puts up is always unbelieveably predictable and ... dare I say it, one-sided and biased. 

    I was listening live to a seminar by Dr. Jean Dodds this afternoon when SHE learned the pup didn't make it.  Hemopet has been sending plasma to this pup all week.  Parvo is horrible -- a puppy could contract parvo in so many places and the problem wasn't that it was exposed. MOST dogs are exposed to parvo at some point in time because it remains in the soil for up to TWO YEARS and you could have had a parvo-sickened animal walk thru your front yard and shed the virus and you might never know about it. 

    The problem was that the pup was vaccinated but immunity wasn't achieved.  

    The allegations in the above post are glittering generalities.  "it is not known" -- not known because ??? It is known ... but whoever wrote that article didn't bother to find out? But it sounds more condemning to say it's 'not known' like it probably wasn't???

    WHEN a shot is given is critical.  A dog is NOT "immune" the instant it's vaccinated, and much depends on what type of shot was given, and whether the dog had already been exposed. 

    A dog could have been "exposed" in the yard of someone before it was dropped off AT the shelter!  It literally takes just a couple of MOLECULES of parvo to spread the disease.  Not gross negligence. 

    Parvo is a huge problem today.  I know we had a parvo dog in our neighborhood three years ago.  I couldn't even allow MY puppy in MY OWN front yard until I knew immunity had been achieved.  Not just that she'd been vax'd.  But that IMMUNITY had been achieved.

    Be just a bit constructive sometime please?  Or maybe you just want to post drama ...

    • Gold Top Dog


    The fact that an AR group runs this shelter is not the cause of the pups infection.... It's like saying that I had a vaccine reaction because my hospital is run by **fill in ideology you dislike** people. As much as I dislike AR extremists, this article makes some ridiculous insinuations.

    • Gold Top Dog

     Not to mention that I wouldn't call PAWS Chicago an AR shelter even if one of the higher ups is associated with it.  They are a great group ime.

    • Gold Top Dog

    calliecritturs
    Everything this poster puts up is always unbelieveably predictable and ... dare I say it, one-sided and biased. 

     

    Callie, I totally agree.

    • Gold Top Dog

    whtsthfrequency
    The fact that an AR group runs this shelter is not the cause of the pups infection....

    My thoughts exactly. Parvo is awful, and it's something you risk when taking on a pup. Doesn't matter where he/she came from, if he had been vaccinated - you just don't know. I've had pups test neg, be vaccinated, and still end up with parvo a week later. It just happens.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Perhaps you are reading what you want to see into this report.

    I am NOT blaming PAWS in any way for the sick puppies. I know that even the best practices are not foolproof. However, I also think that animal shelters need to take very stringent precautions because of the high turnover of dogs from mostly unknown sources. Somehow, the system apparently broke down.

    My essential point is that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

    Animal rights groups constantly assassinate private breeders for allegedly selling sick puppies. They claim that people who raise dogs don't care about their welfare, don't take care of them, and put greed above ethics. In the context of the hundreds of dog people I have known over the years, those claims are absurd.

    Imagine what would have happened if Oprah had purchased those puppies from a private breeder. The animal rights people would have villifed that breeder with a total smear campaign. Animal cruelty charges probably would have been sought for a litter of sick puppies.

    It is a matter of hypocrisy and self-righteousness by people who have no business throwing stones.

    Why should the rules be different for rescue groups? If there is a problem, it needs to be addressed...regardless of who has the problem. 

    • Gold Top Dog

    So...what exactly did Dr. Dodds say about the situation?

    By the way, not known means not known. Don't read anything into my words that is not there. No one at PAWS would discuss the situation with an outsider, and that is why it wasn't known.

    In terms of exposure, it appears that the pups arrived at PAWS on Feb. 15. They appeared on the Oprah Show on March 6. That is 19 days. The normal incubation period is seven-to-14 days. That would place the date of exposure during the period when the pups were at the PAWS shelter.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    eaglerock814

    Perhaps you are reading what you want to see into this report.

    I am NOT blaming PAWS in any way for the sick puppies. I know that even the best practices are not foolproof. However, I also think that animal shelters need to take very stringent precautions because of the high turnover of dogs from mostly unknown sources. Somehow, the system apparently broke down.

     

    "Unfortunately, the PAWS staff and Fasseas apparently haven’t learned the basics of disease management and prevention in an animal shelter with a constant turnover of dogs from many different sources, and the puppies and Winfrey have paid the price."

     

    eaglerock814
    It is a matter of hypocrisy and self-righteousness by people who have no business throwing stones.

    Like 99% of the members on this board I do not support PETA or any extreme AR people or organization. Do they have a right to their opinions? Do they have the right to push their agenda? They sure do. They have the exact same right that you, Yates and the American Sporting Dog Alliance has. I find is so ironic that PETA and American Sporting Dog Alliance, two groups diametrically opposed in their philosophies, end up sounding exactly a like. Both organizations have a tone and rhetoric that I find offensive and manipulative. I find it hard to believe that either group is working in the best interest of the dog.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    denise m

    eaglerock814

    Perhaps you are reading what you want to see into this report.

    I am NOT blaming PAWS in any way for the sick puppies. I know that even the best practices are not foolproof. However, I also think that animal shelters need to take very stringent precautions because of the high turnover of dogs from mostly unknown sources. Somehow, the system apparently broke down.

     

    "Unfortunately, the PAWS staff and Fasseas apparently haven’t learned the basics of disease management and prevention in an animal shelter with a constant turnover of dogs from many different sources, and the puppies and Winfrey have paid the price."

     

    eaglerock814
    It is a matter of hypocrisy and self-righteousness by people who have no business throwing stones.

    Like 99% of the members on this board I do not support PETA or any extreme AR people or organization. Do they have a right to their opinions? Do they have the right to push their agenda? They sure do. They have the exact same right that you, Yates and the American Sporting Dog Alliance has. I find is so ironic that PETA and American Sporting Dog Alliance, two groups diametrically opposed in their philosophies, end up sounding exactly a like. Both organizations have a tone and rhetoric that I find offensive and manipulative. I find it hard to believe that either group is working in the best interest of the dog.

     

    You said it better than I could and it bears repeating.  Radicals can be in any camp and this sort of rhetoric and exaggeration just pushes away the very people in a position to fight the AR groups. 
    • Gold Top Dog
    stardog85

     Not to mention that I wouldn't call PAWS Chicago an AR shelter even if one of the higher ups is associated with it.  They are a great group ime.

     Don't they support MSN laws? If so, how can one call them a "great group"?

      I agree, if these had been puppies from a breeder the breeder would be under attack and AR groups would be using it as an example of how terrible breeders are.

    • Gold Top Dog

    What did Dr. Dodds say?  She was very sad.  She and Hemopet had worked very hard to get blood plasma to the caretakers of this puppy and she lent all the veterinary consult support she could simply because this was a case where vaccine procedures fell short.

    Each state has all sorts of "laws" about vaccine procedures -- in order for a dog to change hands (particularly across state lines) certain vaccines MUST be given in order for that dog to cross state lines and to leave a shelter.

    This was simply a case where vax were given but IMMUNITY was not reached.  There is a HUGE difference between a vaccine having been given and actual **immunity** being reached in an individual animal.

    It's not a case of A or B being evil or wrong.  It's a matter of immunology not being completely understood EVEN BY VETS  -- things like genetic/breed pre-disposition and the fact that killed vaccines need to be boostered after a set number of days in order to be *effective*. 

     Dr. Dodds didn't say much but did say it was a case that immunity hadn't been achieved altho a vaccine had been given.

     So much is mis-understood about immunity.  People tend to think that once a shot is given that immunity is reached.  That is NOT the case.  Immunity takes weeks to fully happen.  Once an animal is vaccinated that vaccine is shed in the *** of that animal for many days.  THAT is also a risk. 

    I'm sure in a high-profile situation -- who knows what photographer could have brought what in on their shoes OR OUT ...

    Essentially Dr. Dodds simply felt badly and stressed that there needs to be more and better understanding both in the general population as a whole AND in the veterinary community and shelters particulalry in HOW vaccines work and **do NOT** work and how vaccines have to be administered to be effective and WHEN they are effective. 

    It has little to do with radical animal rights or not ... it has to do with mis-information and mis-understanding.  And half-truths and "agendas" really don't help anyone.