Foreclosures And Spay/Neuter Mandates

    • Gold Top Dog

    Foreclosures And Spay/Neuter Mandates

    Shelter Statistics Belie Animal Rights Rationale

    For Santa Barbara Spay/Neuter Mandate Push 
    by John Yates
    American Sporting Dog Alliance
     
    SANTA BARBARA, CA – Animal rights activists are continuing to try to take control of a citizens’ task force in their push for a brutal spay and neuter mandate, but they have one enemy that they deeply fear.
     
    The truth.
     
    The truth is that an 18-year track of animal shelter statistics in Santa Barbara County not only belies the purported rationale for such an ordinance, but points to a county that has done everything right to reduce the number of unwanted dogs and cats and has had phenomenal success, even in the face of the recent foreclosure crisis and overall economic hard times. Complete data for the past two years has been kept carefully guarded, but the American Sporting Dog Alliance has been able to piece together a fairly comprehensive picture that documents this success.
     
    After 17 years of steady declines, shelter admissions rose during FY 2007-2008, due almost solely to California’s mortgage foreclosure crisis. Santa Barbara County was particularly hard hit, and many people were not able to keep their pets when they lost their homes.
     
    However, compassion and community support run high in Santa Barbara, and about a third of the increase was absorbed by increases in adoptions and rescue fostering, the data shows. The rest of the increase was taken care of by increasing the number of dogs kept at the shelter, and the average length of their stays.
     
    It must be emphasized that the foreclosure crisis means that many people and their pets are facing very hard times, but it does not mean that these pets are unwanted. The foreclosure crisis is temporary, and the American Sporting Dog Alliance applauds the people of Santa Barbara for showing compassion and dedication in this time of need.
     The Santa Barbara County Spay/Neuter Action Program (SNAP) Task Force is scheduled to meet Wednesday, Jan. 7, at 6 p.m., at the Board of Supervisors Conference Room, 511 E. Lakeside Parkway, Santa Maria, CA. A teleconference site is available at the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, 105 E. Anapamu St. (4th Floor) Santa Barbara. We urge as many dog owners as possible to attend, and also to support the advocates of dog ownership rights who have been placed in a minority position on this committee. The task force has been a deck stacked against dog owners since its inception last summer. A motion by the Board of Supervisors created the task force to study non-mandatory alternatives to reduce the number of unwanted pets in the county. Even the name of the task force belies the stated intention of the supervisors, and most of the focus has been on mandatory measures. The situation went from bad to worse when Dr. Ron Faoro was appointed to chair the task force. Faoro, an animal rights activist, has been stringent about limiting public comment at the meetings, and opponents to spay and neuter mandates have not been invited to make presentations. In contrast, a panel of “humane association” representatives has been invited to address the next meeting. Faoro has been a staunch supporter of mandatory spay/neuter laws and rose to a leadership position in the animal rights community during the failed attempt to impose statewide legislation on Californians. Last summer, he boasted that he was being named to the Board of Directors of the radical Humane Society of the United States. HSUS does not operate a single animal shelter, but exists only as the leading political action organization for the animal rights community. 
    Available data shows that shelter admission and euthanasia rates for both dogs and cats have declined dramatically during the past 18 years, until this year, while adoptions and rescues have continued to rise by a very high rate.
     
    Given two other facts, this success story is nothing short of miraculous:
     
    • The first fact is that the county’s human population has increased by more than 10-percent during this period. This means that there are more dogs and cats than ever in Santa Barbara County, but far fewer unwanted pets.
     
    • The second fact is that California has been plagued with a near-complete collapse of the mortgage and banking industries, combined with record rates of mortgage foreclosures, and that Santa Barbara has been one of the hardest hit counties in the state. After successfully weathering the first 36 months of the foreclosure crisis, Santa Barbara saw an increase of 554 dogs entering the shelter in the most recent fiscal year. This temporary crisis has placed a severe strain on the sheltering and rescue community, but Santa Barbara residents are weathering the storm.
     
    The animal rights groups don’t want people to know the facts. They want to distort the data to make it falsely appear that there is a crisis in pet “overpopulation” because of the foreclosure crisis. The truth is that Santa Barbara has dealt successfully with the situation and its impact on animals, and federal bailouts of the banking industry point to the end of the foreclosure crisis in the near future.
     
    Complete shelter statistics have not been released to either the public or members of the task force, which has been fed only selected numbers with no basis for comparison to previous years and no way to evaluate their meaning.
     
    The animal rights groups are guilty of nothing short of a con job, both to the task force and to the county supervisors. As with most con jobs, a wise person learns quickly never to take her or his eyes off the ball.
     
    The con job is the selective use of those statistics to create an illusion of a problem with unwanted animals.
     
    Dog owners can never allow themselves to forget that the goal of animal rights groups is the complete elimination of animal ownership in America, as rapidly as politically possible. They pretend to be compassionate, but in truth their goal is to take as many animals as possible out of the breeding pool. As Humane Society of the United States head Wayne Pacelle said a few years ago, “One generation and out.”
     
    That’s the plan. Lies and manipulation are the tactics.
     
    HSUS and its allies try to manipulate sentiment and emotion, while concealing the facts.
     
    Here are some of the facts for Santa Barbara County that the animal rights groups fear:
     
    • For FY 2007-2008, 4,578 dogs were admitted to the county shelter. Euthanasia figures have been hidden, but in previous years, roughly 17-percent of the dogs that have been admitted have been euthanized, which would be 772 at the same rate for the most recent fiscal year. In previous years, almost all of these dogs were euthanized at the request of their owners due to illness, injuries, severe behavior problems such as aggression, or extreme old age, or because they were “pit bulls.” Virtually no healthy and adoptable dogs were euthanized at those rates, data has shown.
     
    • The FY 2007-2008 data shows the impact of the foreclosure crisis. It is a sharp increase over 2006-2007, when 4,024 dogs were admitted to the shelter system. In FY 2005-2006, 4,121 dogs were admitted.
     
    • But the news during the mortgage crisis was not all bad. Dog rescues increased from about 210 in FY 2006-2007, to about 240 in only the first 10 months of FY 2007-2008. These figures are approximate, as the only available official data is in the form of line graph.
     
    • During the same period, dog adoptions increased substantially during every year prior to June 2008; data since June is not available.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance urges dog owners to contact the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors to praise them for helping animals get through the foreclosure crisis, but also to remind them that a temporary crisis does not justify taking an action that would destroy the work of many dedicated fanciers in Santa Barbara County, and do irreparable harm by removing some of the highest quality dogs in America from the genetic pool.
     
    Harming high quality dog fanciers in Santa Barbara County simply means that people will buy more “puppy mill” dogs and imported dogs from Mexico when the foreclosure crisis has passed.
     
    It also makes no sense whatsoever to pass a law that impacts only people who are continuing to provide a good home for their dogs.
     
    In addition, data from every other community that has passed a spay/neuter mandate shows a rapid increase in pet abandonment, shelter admissions and euthanasia rates. In Santa Barbara, this would substantially worsen the impact of the foreclosure crisis.
     
    In other communities, such as nearby Los Angeles, spay/neuter mandates have caused dog licensing revenues to plunge, thus limiting the financial ability of the Santa Barbara sheltering program to help dogs left homeless by the foreclosure crisis.
     
    Here is contact information for the supervisors:
     1st District: Salud Carbajal, Chair Phone:(805) 568-2186Fax: (805) 568-2534E-mail: SupervisorCarbajal@sbcbos1.org 2nd District: Janet Wolf Phone: (805) 568-2191Fax: (805) 568-2283E-mail: jwolf@sbcbos2.org 3rd District: Brooks Firestone Phone:(805) 568-2192Fax: (805) 568-2883Solvang: (805) 686-5095Fax: (805) 686-8133E-mail: bfirestone@co.santa-barbara.ca.us  4th District: Joni Gray Lompoc: (805) 737-7700Santa Maria: (805) 346-8407E-mail: jgray@co.santa-barbara.ca.us 5th District: Joseph Centeno, Vice Chair Santa Maria: (805) 346-8400Fax: (805) 346-8404E-mail: jcenteno@co.santa-barbara.ca.us 
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We also welcome people who work with other breeds, as legislative issues affect all of us. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by your donations in order to maintain strict independence.
     
    Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. Our email is asda@csonline.net.
     

    PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS

     
    • Gold Top Dog
    Being involved is rescue has made me more in favor of strict spay and neuter laws. If you want to breed a dog then you should have to get a license. If you dpo not have a license you should be required to fix your dogs. I realize that this is not the pc opinion, but I really hate the sky is falling attitude of breeder whenever these laws are mentioned. If they backed these laws, they could have enough influence to get the laws written in a way that benefits them. In other words, if you reduce the number of byb's and puppy mills then you get more business.
    • Gold Top Dog

    Jewlieee
    Being involved is rescue has made me more in favor of strict spay and neuter laws. If you want to breed a dog then you should have to get a license. If you dpo not have a license you should be required to fix your dogs. I realize that this is not the pc opinion, but I really hate the sky is falling attitude of breeder whenever these laws are mentioned. If they backed these laws, they could have enough influence to get the laws written in a way that benefits them. In other words, if you reduce the number of byb's and puppy mills then you get more business.

     

    I think some of the beef (at least my main beef) is that breeders and even the non-breeding public with intact dogs are already subject to paying fees and licenses and being regulated by their counties and the AKC.  I'm fine with paying yet another fee for my intact dog, but I am skeptical because what is happening with the fees and licenses that are already being paid and obtained?  How can the government really do what they say they will do when current regulations are not enforced?  How are more fees and regulations going to change anything?

    Also the general public needs to get educated and CARE before anything will even matter.  Just look at VP Joe Biden, he got a puppy from a known puppy mill!  It is public record that the breeder breeds 250-500 dogs per year and was cited and fined for the conditions of her kennel.  So many people go to a puppy mill and then defend their decision or even go back.  Puppy mills thrive even with current regulations in place.  Why not attack the demand since regulating the supply has not worked at all?

    • Gold Top Dog

    I am not sure how I feel about this. Frankly, I don't think it's a bad idea to limit the number of litters a person produces, but mandatory s/n I do have an issue with. I'd prefer a limit like that allows breeders to breed more litters at certain times in their program and understands that some years people have no litters and others, they may have several (maybe a limit on the number produced per 10 years).

    The flip side is that there is no way to enforce this. Just like BSL, it's not going to get the desired effect, and will hit responsible parties more.

    If there were an easy answer, we'd already have it. 

    • Gold Top Dog

    http://www.canismajor.com/dog/spayneut.html

     National statistic for voluntary spay/nueter is 75%. I always find it hard to swallow when I hear people involved in the fancy parrot animal rightist views. Reminds me of a story.

    There was a Chemistry professor in a large college that had some exchange
    students in the class. One day while the class was in the lab the Professor
    noticed one young man (exchange student) who kept rubbing his back, and
    stretching as if his back hurt.

    The professor asked the young man what was the matter. The student told him
    he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting
    communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country's
    government and install a new communist government.

    In the midst of his story he looked at the professor and asked a strange
    question. He asked, 'Do you know how to catch wild pigs?'

    The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young
    man said this was no joke. 'You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place
    in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to
    come everyday to eat the free corn. When they are used to coming every day,
    you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming.
    When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you
    put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat
    again. You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a
    gate in the last side. The pigs, which are used to the free corn, start to
    come through the gate to eat; you slam the gate on them and catch the whole
    herd.

    Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around
    inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free
    corn . They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the
    woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.

    The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening
    to America . The government keeps pushing us toward socialism and keeps
    spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental
    income, tax credit for unearned income, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies,
    payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare, medicine, drugs, etc. while we
    continually lose our freedoms - just a little at a time.

    ----------------------------------------------------------

    And this is how we will lose our right to breed dogs and control our
    ownership of pets, a little at a time. Denver and Dallas here, California
    there, Pennsylvania next. When it becomes impossible for anyone to breed
    dogs except (possibly) commercial breeders who have business licenses,
    inspections, and USDA approved concrete runs and water-impermeable surfaces,
    we will wonder how it happened. The answer will be "one piece of fence at a
    time" One compromise at a time. One "reasonable negotiation" at a time.

    If you've ever said the following, you're guilty of providing a fence post:
    -- If you have nothing to hide, you shouldn't be afraid of inspections
    -- No one should have more than ------- dogs.
    -- No one should breed more than ----- litters a year,
    -- Breeding pets is wrong.
    -- No one should breed except to Improve the Breed.
    -- You should have a license to own a (fill in the breed.)
    -- Breeders with more than ____ dogs should be inspected.

    If no one breeds except show breeders,
    a) Do you really believe the animal rightists will stop there?
    b) Where will the pets come from?

    When people can no longer buy a good pet, perhaps we will wake up. Until
    then, we continue to bash each other, criticize our fellow breeders, and
    support spay/neuter laws for "everyone but me."

    When animal control comes to remove your dogs because you are one dog over
    the limit or because your dogs are in crates or because your neighbor says
    you didn't have water for them one day last week, perhaps then you will
    realize that fighting bad legislation is not just for the activists and
    fanatics. When you have compromised away your right to breed at all perhaps
    you will realize that there IS no compromise with the animal rights
    movement.

    "First they came for the commercial breeders, and I did not speak out~~
    because I was not a commercial breeder.
    Then they came for the backyard breeders, and I did not speak out
    because I was not a backyard breeder.
    Then they came for the one-time breeders, and I did not speak out~~
    because I was not a one-time breeder.
    And they came for me~~
    And there was no one left to speak out for me."

    Time to wake up, AKC breeders. They're coming for us.

    (Note: Although this addresses AKC breeders, it most surely involves ALL breeders.)