Cita
Posted : 8/5/2008 3:51:41 PM
Leases of horses are extremely common, and have been for a long time. The main difference is that if several different people are using/riding the horse during the same period, the horse is typically kept in the same barn and the different riders come there (as opposed to keeping the horse in a different barn each week or somesuch).
I don't see "dog leasing" as that wildly different. Assuming the dog has the temperament to be able to handle the changes, and a good deal of precautions are taken to minimize stress (keeping a schedule, same food, extensive screening, consistent training/commands, etc.), I don't see what the big deal is. Wouldn't it be better to "rent" a dog than to go out and buy one of your own when you weren't equipped to give it a good life 24/7? I know plenty of people who would LOVE to be able to "borrow" a dog for a few hours, or for a weekend, to take the dog hiking, cuddle with the dog to watch movies, etc. But during the week (or during a couple of weeks a month, such as traveling) they just can't adequately care for a dog, so they don't own one.
Especially if the dogs used in these programs are "dogs in need," such as shelter dogs who aren't being adopted, it seems like a win-win situation for animal lovers and for dogs. At least in theory. I'd be interested to hear how it works in practice.