calliecritturs
Posted : 12/11/2007 10:31:06 PM
It's a pretty big victory -- we were all morally outraged, but it's very difficult for non-legal folks to really grasp how very THIN our laws are, particularly that carry any serious jail time.
I want to say this carefully so it's not misconstrued -- It's not illegal to be a 'jerk' or 'immoral' or even 'cruel'. The "illegality" has to be in the actual crime. And that tends to be what HE had his actual physical hands on. And "intent" is a very tricky thing to prove. Simply trying to prove that he was "behind" it is unbelievably slippery because it's removed so many steps from his actual 'hands'.
Does that make sense? In other words, it's so easy to say "well I told someone to .... but they didn't do THAT, they did this instead and THAT was illegal ..."
I just wish they could have actually pinned him with racketeering -- TAKING profits from the fights/betting. That would have gotten considerably more jail time and would have eternally fried his career.
Hopefully by the time he serves whatever he has to serve, and then emerges and 're-invents' himself he will have missed the best of his career. PLUS he will have a jail record -- And that does count for something, altho as James Brown proved, it doesn't hold you back a whole lot. Different type of crime totally -- and Mr. Vick has gotten some seriously bad press.