Wonderful news for animals!

    • Gold Top Dog

    Wonderful news for animals!

    Sorry you all, I know I just added a post but I feel this needs it's own post. However, they also sent an email saying that one of the Chicago Alderman is trying to ban pits... It does bother me though that in the story they say "six children were attacked by 3 pit bulls and the next sentance is that a  "14 year old was killed by "four dogs"". Funny how they mentioned the pitties in the first one but the second one was just "4 dogs".

    Subject: Gov. Blagojevich signs legislation toughening penalties against
    owners of vicious dogs that endanger the public




    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                  
    May 31, 2006                                          
                                                
    Gov. Blagojevich signs legislation toughening penalties against owners
    of vicious dogs that endanger the public

          Illinois becomes first state in the nation to ban felons from
        owning or possessing unaltered dogs that could be used as weapons

    SPRINGFIELD - Governor Rod R. Blagojevich today signed new laws
    toughening the penalties for owners of vicious and dangerous dogs if
    their pets attack someone.  The laws also include the nation's first
    restrictions banning convicted drug dealers and violent offenders from
    using dogs as weapons, and increased penalties for dog fighting.

    "Dogs can make great companions, but if they're not trained well or
    restrained, some dogs can also pose serious threats - especially to
    children.  We've seen too many people seriously injured by dogs whose
    owners allow them to act more like wild predators than pets," Gov.
    Blagojevich said.  "I'm pleased to sign these new laws making it clear
    that dog owners will be held responsible for their pet's actions -
    especially if the animal has been declared vicious or dangerous - and
    the consequences will be severe if an owner ignores their responsibility
    and someone gets hurt."

    House Bill 4238, sponsored by State Rep. Mike Boland (D-East Moline) and
    State Sen. Don Harmon (D-Oak Park), increases the criminal penalty to a
    Class 3 felony punishable by up to five years in prison if the owner of
    a vicious dog fails to keep their dog in an enclosure or fails to spay
    or neuter the animal and it gets loose and kills or seriously injures
    someone.
    If the owner knowingly allowed the dog to run loose or failed to take
    steps to keep the animal in an enclosure, the offense is a Class 2
    felony, carrying a potential prison term of three to seven years.

    The bill also makes it a Class 4 felony, carrying a sentence of 1-3
    years, if the owner of a dangerous dog has not complied with orders
    regarding their dog and the dog inflicts serious physical injury on a
    person or other animal.  If the owner of a dangerous dog fails to comply
    with any order regarding their dog and the dog kills a person, the owner
    will now be guilty of a Class 3 felony, punishable by 2-5 years in jail.

    A dangerous dog, determined by the Illinois Department of Agriculture or
    local animal control, is a dog that poses a serious threat or has,
    without justification, bitten a person but does not cause serious
    physical injury.
    A vicious dog, determined by circuit courts, is a dog that, without
    justification, attacks a person and causes serious physical injury or
    death or has been found to be a "dangerous dog" on 3 separate occasions.

    Dangerous and vicious dog attacks in Illinois have led to serious
    injuries and even death. In November, six children were reportedly
    attacked in Cary, Illinois by three pit bulls, and in 2005, a
    fourteen-year-old was killed after being mauled by four dogs near her
    home in the northwest town of Erie.

    "This bill started nearly a year ago, with the death of a 14 year old
    girl named Lydia Chaplin who lived in a rural area near my district,"
    said Representative Boland.  "This is a proposal to take a 'bite' out of
    the root causes for violent dog attacks by holding dog owners
    responsible should their dog attack. I believe this legislation provides
    a solution that promises a better future for both the public and for
    pets."

    "Dangerous dogs are a threat to public safety. With this new law, we
    send the message that owners of dangerous dogs will face real
    consequences if their dogs threaten our children and families," said
    Senator Harmon.

    "The tough, new penalties in this law should provide added incentive for
    dog owners to do the right thing and have their pets spayed or
    neutered,"
    Dr. Colleen O'Keefe, division manager of Food Safety and Animal
    Protection for the Illinois Department of Agriculture, said.  "Dogs that
    have been 'fixed' generally are more docile and less likely to attack.
    Plus, sterilization helps to control the pet population, reducing the
    number of potential strays."

    HB 4238 also:

    *     Clarifies that pet owners may be held liable for damages in civil
    court if their pet, without provocation, attempts to attack, attacks, or
    injures someone.

    *     Removes a $50 cap on the fine that counties may levy on the owners
    of
    dogs that are caught running at-large in unincorporated areas.  Counties
    themselves now may decide the appropriate amount of those fines.

    *     Allows judges to impose an extended prison term if a defendant,
    while
    committing a felony offense, directed an animal to assault a policeman
    or used an animal to further the criminal activities of an organized
    gang.

    Governor Blagojevich signed into law two other pieces of public safety
    legislation, including the pioneering restrictions on dog ownership by
    felons.

    House Bill 2946, sponsored by State Rep. Jerry Mitchell (R-Sterling) and
    State Sen. William Haine (D-Alton), prohibits felons convicted of
    forcible felonies, felonies under the Humane Care for Animals Act, Class
    3 felonies under the Illinois Controlled Substances and Cannabis Act,
    Class 3 felonies under the Methamphetamine Control and Community
    Protection Act, and felonies under the Deadly Weapons Statue from owning
    a dog that has not been spayed or neutered.  It also prohibits these
    felons from owning any dog that has been declared vicious or dangerous.
    Additionally, dogs owned by a felon must have a microchip inserted under
    their skin for identification. These prohibitions take effect upon the
    felon's release from custody and last for a period of ten years.
    Violations of this law are Class A misdemeanors.

    "We in the legislature became aware of the problem of drug manufacturers
    keeping dangerous dogs in order to have those dogs attack law
    enforcement officers as they perform their duties.  This bill will give
    law enforcement and prosecutors another tool to fight these criminals
    who hold no regard for others," said Senator Haine.

    "This legislation makes sure that felons will no longer be able to turn
    man's best friend into a nightmare for law abiding citizens. I am very
    proud to be a part of its implementation and I think it will make a
    difference to all of us," said Representative Mitchell.

    "HB 2946 prevents convicted felons, who already cannot possess firearms,
    from using intact or unsterilized dogs as weapons to terrorize their
    community," Ledy VanKavage, director of legal training, legislation and
    outreach for the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
    Animals, said.  "Unsterilized dogs were responsible for 89% of the fatal
    dog attacks last year.  Studies have shown that intact canines also are
    responsible for the majority of bites nationwide.  The ASPCA commends
    Gov. Blagojevich and the Illinois General Assembly for their proactive
    approach to addressing this important public safety issue."

    House Bill 4711, sponsored by State Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia (D-Aurora)
    and State Sen. Iris Martinez (D-Chicago), increases various penalties
    for dog fighting.  Attending a dog fight is now a Class A misdemeanor
    for a first offense, carrying a sentence of up to 1 year in jail and a
    Class 4 felony for any subsequent offenses, carrying a sentence of 1 - 3
    years in prison.
    Bringing a child younger than 13 years old to a dog fight is now a Class
    4 felony for the first violation, and a Class 3 felony thereafter,
    punishable by a sentence of 2-5 years in jail.  The bill also permits
    criminal courts to infer that a dog fighting violation has occurred if a
    defendant possesses a dog and dog fighting equipment, and requires any
    evidence seized in dog fighting cases to be kept and provided to police
    agencies for training purposes.

    "We've heard a lot about vicious dog attacks in the news recently, but
    we haven't heard about one of the underlying causes of dog attacks - dog
    fighting," Representative Linda Chapa LaVia said.  "Frequently, dogs are
    trained to be vicious by owners who wish to use their animals in dog
    fights, and what's worse is that a lot of dog fights have connections to
    street gangs.  I introduced this legislation to crack down on this cruel
    blood sport and to help eliminate an illegal revenue stream fueling
    violence in our community.  I applaud Gov. Blagojevich for recognizing
    this severity of this problem by signing House Bill 4711 into law."

    "Strengthening law enforcement's ability to intercede in dog fighting
    rings will make our streets more secure," said Senator Martinez.
    "Increasing the penalties for exposing children to such extreme violence
    will help ensure that children are shielded from such horror and not
    encouraged to watch it.
    I'm confident that our communities will be safer places to live and
    raise families when our concerns about dog fighting violence are
    alleviated."

    HB 4238 becomes law immediately.  The other two bills take effect
    January 1, 2007.
    • Gold Top Dog
    This won't stop the problem.  What's next telling us what breed of dog or how many dogs we are allowed to have?  We just keep having our rights taken away inch by inch.  So all the people who do have dangerous breeds are not going to be able to have those breeds.  The regular dog owner is not the one causing trouble its those careless other owners.  This makes me sick.
    • Gold Top Dog
    I dont know if you live in a city or not but the city I live in does indeed tell you how many dogs you may have. Our limit in the city is 4 dogs unless you have a liscense to breed. (Of course people sneak around this but it is the rule).

    I think it would be bad if they banned a certain breed of dog but they are trying not to. I am not sure if you read all of it but it is mostly about drug dealers who have felonies not being able to train their dogs to attack police officers (a dog cant tell a difference between police and regular people). I guess you didnt read it because no where does it say ANY breed of dog is banned. "A dangerous dog, determined by the Illinois Department of Agriculture or
    local animal control, is a dog that poses a serious threat or has,
    without justification, bitten a person but does not cause serious
    physical injury.
    A vicious dog, determined by circuit courts, is a dog that, without
    justification, attacks a person and causes serious physical injury or
    death or has been found to be a "dangerous dog" on 3 separate occasions"

    ""I'm pleased to sign these new laws making it clear
    that dog owners will be held responsible for their pet's actions -
    especially if the animal has been declared vicious or dangerous - and
    the consequences will be severe if an owner ignores their responsibility
    and someone gets hurt." --I applaud that. They are not saying any breed in particular only vicious dogs which is what all of these people are fighting for instead of unfair bans on a breed.

    Hopefully this bill will help get a lot more animals fixed. ""The tough, new penalties in this law should provide added incentive for
    dog owners to do the right thing and have their pets spayed or
    neutered," "

    They arent at all telling you what breed of dog you can or cant own they are simply making penalites stiffer for people who can't control their agressive dog. (Which is the way it should be)
    • Gold Top Dog
    The fact is criminals when continue to break the law and most will not get caught even if this passes.  What's the next breed bans?  then telling everyone that theyhave to fix their  dog?  Come on.   That should be a personal choice and if a person is responsible and choses to keep their dog intact but keeps them so they cannot get out and breed I see no reason why you cannot keep your dog intact. At some point the laws will start effecting the regular Joe Blow dog owner and then what will everyone do?  Criminals will still break the law regardless and I can see breed bans and other worse laws going into effect its just a matter of time.
    • Gold Top Dog
    If they wish more people to get their dogs fixed then they should have lower cost spay and neuter programs available in all counties for anyone who wishes to do that instead of fining them.