jennie_c_d
Posted : 8/15/2007 11:20:40 AM
This is a fair question, really it is, but does that mean that everyone who gets a dog should have thousands of dollars saved for "what if" vet bills? I'm considering the possibility of thinking about maybe getting a second dog , but I'm looking at cheapy shelters and passing over the ones whose adoption fee is hundreds of dollars because I need the money I have for supplies, training, vetting, etc. Since I don't have $400 for an adoption fee on top of everything else, does that mean I shouldn't get another dog? I'm actually wondering, not being hostile.
I think it's a really good idea to have *some* money saved, especially after the recent incidences of high-cost veterinary care, at my house. I am putting some money in a savings account, every week. It's just a little money, but it's there just for the dogs.
What if I hadn't had the relationship with my vet when Teenie got sick? She would have died! For bladder stones! I wouldn't have been able to pay for the surgery in full, and I wouldn't have let her live in that kind of pain. She couldn't even move without hurting. It was terrible. She couldn't stand up and walk, because it hurt so bad.
For all of the breeds I've seriously looked into, it's been no more than $1500 for a pet quality puppy. By the time a responsible breeder has approved me and has a litter on the ground, I could have saved that much, without too much trouble. If I were adopting another shelter dog, though, I'd go up the road to Animal Control and pay $50. IME, a dog with an unknown background is a dog with an unknown background. Doesn't matter if I pay $250 for it from a rescue or $50 from Animal Control....