Pwca
Posted : 8/17/2007 5:19:22 AM
Indy was so bratty that he did not get tattooed when we tried before. (I volunteered to hold dogs for a friend of mine whose normal assistant was sick and she agreed to tattoo Indy for me if we had time after the scheduled dog, she was workign at an ID clinic day thing) BUT- he was much more upset about being flipped over on his back and the noise of the tattoo gun (He doesn't like clippers, either) than the needle- he's actually got a little black dot but we didn't do the rest. Of all the dogs that were done that day, only one acted like it was at all bothersome.
I think in generally tattooing is pretty painless. Mal will be getting tattooed (he's already chipped) and I'm actually thinking about learning to do it so that I can offer it as a service locally and tattoo my fosters. Microchips are great, but if an individual finds a dog and doesn't know about them (and doesn't take the dog to a vet, which, frankly, a lot of folks won't- especially if they want to keep the dog!) they're not that useful.
The thigh tattoos that I've seen stay clear and readable on light-skinned dogs and reasonably readable on dark-skinned dogs- it's harder, but it's visibly there- the dog may have to get shaved on the thigh to really be able to make it out on an old dog. They seem to stay more legible than ear tattoos in older greyhounds (All my friends with retired racers, at the moment, have seniors- the only YOUNG greyhound I know right now is from show-lines!) and they're WAY more readable than lip tattoos in horses. (In fairness, TBs- the main breed I know of that's tattooed regularly- live a lot longer for that tattoo to get more messed up.

)