calliecritturs
Posted : 7/22/2009 6:05:17 PM
Kim_MacMillan
I don't put a number on it, I look at it instead in terms of finances, time, and effort required. In other words, adults generally are easier than puppies, "pets" are less time than performance dogs, dogs already trained are easier than dogs-in-training, etc.
Kim put it into good words for me as well -- ALTHO I have an additional proviso. Technically my city doesn't even want 3, so I'm over the legal limit - which doesn't yank my chain because I make sure there is no annoyance factor. My dogs are NOT allowed to bark inside or out in any sort of excess and they are never left outside unsupervised).
But four truly pushes it because I really don't have 4 corners in my kitchen in which to feed them (postage-stamp sized kitchen -- as it is they are all butt to butt) -- but as David always says mostly we only step-over Kee Shu. We've learned this house is just TOO small for anything more than 3 unless it is a special circumstance with a dog that just slides right in.
Honestly? My personal preference is two -- simply because that's one for me and one for David and the dogs go most everywhere with us. But for various reasons that isn't as germaine with this particular pack as it has been in the past.
But I have to say -- I think it is a MARVELOUS thing to talk about -- because far too few people give this serious thought -- and ONE dog can change everything. sometimes it's "one *more*" and sometimes it's that one particular dog that may tip the scales.