Cita
Posted : 12/2/2008 8:44:51 PM
kle1986
Giving up Cheyanne would mean putting her to sleep. She doesnt considering anywhere home unless Im there. I know from experience when I moved out of my parents and I had a friend keep Cheyanne for me while I was living somewhere else. She stayed in the dog house and only came out to eat,drink,and use the bathroom. In the house she just curls up in a ball and doesnt move.
Rascal was like that when his original owner died. He wouldn't eat (I'm talking walking away from roast chicken and pot roast here), wouldn't play with anything or anyone, and was just generally depressed. After 1 month, he was pretty attached to me and was pepping up a little bit. (Sniffing things while out on walks, eating a bit, etc.) After 3 months, he was intensely, totally velcro-y bonded to me. And playing and eating like a puppy.
I guess what I'm saying is I'm all about keeping animals "for life," but in practicality (IMO at least) the best thing for the animal is to look at the situation with the animal's best interest in mind and set aside our own feelings. It's sooooo easy for us to be selfish and think the animal could never be happy without us, but I think 99.9% of the time that just isn't true.
If it came down to it and I had a kid with very, very serious allergies, and I could find a truly exceptional home for my dog, I would probably rehome. As others pointed out - the kid would remember the stress of the animal(s), but the animals would not suffer nearly as much by moving to a new, wonderful home, so, to maximize the happiness of all involved... I wouldn't like it, but I'd do what I could to ensure the best welfare of everyone.