Kim_MacMillan
Posted : 1/11/2008 11:39:59 AM
kelliope
Does anyone really know very many people who treat their dogs like humans???
To me, it means misunderstanding the dog's needs, and treating the dog as if it had the needs of a human (and usually the needs of the human that owns that particular dog). It is in a huge part ignoring the utmost needs of the dog. Even though some needs may be the same, some needs are also different, and the type of need is also different.
For example, vegetarian diets. They are a human feature, not a dog feature, Dogs are predators, and carnivores, and they require meat in their diet to thrive. Forcing dogs to eat a vegetarian or vegan diet because of human beliefs is, in my opinion, wrong. I know people will disagree with e, but that is how I feel. Another is regularly dressing dogs in miniature clothing. By this I mean the multi-billion dollar fashion industry for dogs. For small and short-coated dogs living in cool climates, sure, a greyhound sweater or a small sweater is fine - it's for the dog's benefit. But when you dress your Chihuahua up in the lastest Mary Kate fashion with the diamond-studded insignia, that's going a bit far. The same goes for assuming small dogs do not require exercise, never need to actually walk on a leash but are carried everywhere, don't have a need to dig or chew, etc. For me it comes down to asking - is doing/buying/trying this for the dog, or for the human's sense of satisfaction?
Some people really seem to believe that dogs think like people do. They assign things like spite to their dogs - giving them qualities that dogs don't seem to have. They seem to think that dogs naturally understand human language and desires ("But he KNOWS what I want!";).
That's not to say that people don't do things for their dogs, or buy them dogs that dogs don't necessarily need or care about. I think it would be lying to say that they don't. Even I do, although I am a person who is very, very, very much into understanding dogs as dogs, understanding their needs as dogs, and fulfilling those needs as dogs. My thing is getting them collars that I consider appealing. And often I get a leash to match it. The shelves are full of collars, but I'll go out of my way to order special ones that aren't on the shelf. The dogs don't care what their collar is made of or what color it is. I do. But that's something I'm perfectly happy to live with knowing. Another example is buying them gifts for their birthdays or Christmas. You know? The dog has no idea it has just aged another year, it has no relevance to a dog. But the dog enjoys the "fun day with new stuff", and I like having excuses to buy extra stuff and give them....lol...so that's good enough for me. I think it becomes "humanizing" when we actually believe that the dogs care or know about these things.
The only difference is the extent to which we will do such things. I would never have a stroller for a dog unless it was for a health reason (on the other hand, I did once push Shimmer around a store in a shopping cart once to prevent her from walking around yucky unknown floors while a very young puppy - health reasons, not fashion. The shopping cart was pretty ugly *G*). I don't dress up my dogs unless there is a reason to. When Gaci was spayed, she wore a T-shirt to protect her belly and stitches from catching on things. When she had surgery on her vulva, she wore toddler panties to prevent excess bacteria from entering and to make it feel less "Naked" and more "hairy" (as that feeling made her very anxious). Again for me it is asking - is it for the dog, or is it for you? I would never in my life consider piercing my dog's ears. Yes, people do it.
As for as "treatment" goes, I would indeed treat my dogs with the same level of empathy and respect as I would a child. But that's not humanizing, that is being human and understanding a dog for what it is.