sillysally
Posted : 12/18/2006 1:28:48 PM
ORIGINAL: Luvntzus
ORIGINAL: gaylemarie
this is an honest question, not meant to be snide or argumentative in any way. because i honestly do not know. to me pride or love of the breed is not a factual reason, it is self serving. so..
why do breeds need to be preserved? should the ones known to have major health issue's be altered? what if altering required cross-breeding, would it be ok?
You're absolutely right. I'm sure most people don't want to admit it or believe it, but breeding ANY dog is selfish. Each breed fills a different purpose for people. A retriever retrieves for people, a protection dog protects people, a lapdog is a companion for a person, and so on... I'm not saying that the dogs are being mistreated in anyway, but to deny that dogs are bred for selfish reasons (filling a need for people) is just naive.
Well, if you want to look at it that way, OWNING any dog is selfish. We don't own dogs because we dislike them, we own them, and other pets because we like having them around. The very existance of companion animals and livestock is selfish.
However, at some point ethics have to come into play. If you are breeding to rake in the cash, with little regard for the health or future prospects of the lives you are bringing into this world, then you are an unethical breeder, IMHO. This is true whether you are breeding dogs, horses, birds, or any companion animal.
Sally, our first dog, was a rescue, and Jack, our younger dog is from a reputable breeder. I'm sure there were people who thought we should have gotten our second dog from a rescue, but we had our reasons for getting Jack and I don't regret it for a second.