DougB
Posted : 11/25/2009 7:36:15 PM
I made this comment on Pet Finder and got ripped up pretty good, but it is a consideration.
Some of the rules that rescues use actually hinder placing pets. It seems like it is better to euth an animal than place it with a family that doesn't meet standards set by the rescue. A potential adopter comes to a rescue, goes thru all the hoops, and is rejected because they kennel a dog , or use a pet door. They fix the" problems"and go to another rescue , go thru a different set of hoops, and are rejected because now they don't have a pet door. Or they live on a farm and are rejected because they want the cat to hunt mice in the barn. Or they want to hunt the dog.
I am considering getting another dog, preferably a Springer. I agree with spay/neuter, vet care, quality food, training, but I also leave my dog in a kennel when I am not home or when she starts helping with the housework. So, many rescues wont consider me . And they have a clause in the contract where they can take the animal back if they don't like the way I treat it. This means that I pay an adoption fee to rent an animal, getting the right to pay for feeding, vetting , training and loving an animal that I can lose because someone doesn't agree with the way I care for an animal.
I understand the need for standard and agree that a rescue has the right to set their own. They own the dog. But if the option is killing an animal because the inn is full, maybe some flexibility in the standards is needed. (Before I get any comments about the kennel, Piper is on the sofa right now and will move to a bed after she gets some rest . The doghouse is heated, the water bowl is heated, there is a tarp and sun screen over the kennel)