polarexpress
Posted : 4/9/2008 5:42:54 PM
This is nuts---ALL of it! The original plan was to turn more than half of the parks into "dedicated dog parks"? So there would be more parks for dogs than for humans? Nuts!
And fencing areas for dogs was "rejected outright because it segregated animals from the community." Fencing segregates them? NUTS! Funny, I think fencing keeps dogs from getting hurt and killed by cars, etc.
Then to threaten to kill dogs and babies over this? Nuts and nuts again. I think compentency hearings are in order for some folks...and criminal threatening charges might also be a good idea.