ron2
Posted : 8/30/2006 5:15:59 PM
Excellent article and thank you for sharing. It's interesting to note that, after 10 years of analysis, the do find, in fact that the arctic breeds are older than some of the other breeds. This places, say a Siberian Husky, closer to wolf than, of course, a Pomeranian. In fact, it's a "pet" theory of mine (pun intended) that the Sibe has retained it's wolfish look because it was never bred for looks, but for performance and temperment. For at least 1,000 years of recorded history the Siberian, formerly the chukchi dog, lived with the families, including children.
I find it interesting that, through the process of domestication, we may have accidently altered the pack taboo of physical violence. I.e., a dog may be more violent or aggressive than a wolf, as wolves fighting in the pack would disrupt the ability to hunt and survive as a pack.
Also, that the dog is more readily attuned to a human and able to understand a human than a wolf or chimp. To this, I would be tempted to say that it is possible for a human to be alpha to a dog, but not to a wolf or chimp. By alpha, I mean leader, prime, one to follow, whatever. This also could mean that a dog can see it's humans as members of its pack, especially if it's well socialized to humans. Now, if dogs have lost the inhibition towards intrapack violence that wolves have, it is certainly upon us humans to keep a lid on it, through training, control of the environment, etc. I still think that wolves and dogs evolved from a common ancestor, though it may have been a canid not much changed from the grey wolf, but I'm not sure they've totally figured it out, yet. But it could certainly refine some aspects of our understanding of dogs and how to interact with them.
Or you could be like me and have a domesticated bear (Thanks, Glenda.)