Jan
Posted : 8/18/2006 11:58:59 PM
If it makes you feel better, if you had pet insurance, there's a good chance you'd still be paying $400 a month (or maybe $385 a month if you were really lucky). There are a lot of hidden clauses about things they won't pay for, anything that can be labelled pre-existing, any disease that the breed may be predisposed to, certain types of accidents, a host of special illnesses, etc. So if you do buy pet insurance, you really need to read the fine print. You'd be amazed at the creative excuses they come up with not to pay out on stuff.
My sister's cat got caught in a recliner chair and needed hip surgery, and they told her they couldn't pay for it because they were somehow convinced that the hip problem was pre-existing, even though nothing in the vet records or the cat's history suggested hip problems.
Then again, maybe this is insurance in general. Last year, my insurance company decided a treatment I needed was "experimental" and therefore not covered, even though it's been around for 10 plus years and was the only possible treatment for my problem and the insurance company's doctor AND his boss agreed with my doctor that this was the only option for me...every other state recognized it as legit, too, but since my insurance is based in Wisconsin, which is apparently in the Dark Ages, medically speaking, I got to pay for it myself.
Just don't expect too much out of pet insurance. If it covers a serious illness, that's great, but you don't want to rely on it as your only option and then find out it doesn't cover much of anything, because that can leave you more vulnerable than if you had no insurance, since you know with no insurance to save some money for vet bills.
Sorry to sound so cynical, but every person I know who's had a major problem with their pet found their pet insurance was practically useless. I personally still can't get over that they thought paying $6 toward anesthesia constituted "coverage..."
Jan