g33
Posted : 12/29/2006 12:32:08 PM
I think that the reason resolutions are so often broken is that they are neither spoken as, nor occur as "possibility" to most folks. As soon as a resolution is made it becomes this "thing" staked into the ground and something that people have to STRIVE for. Striving always comes out of a loss of power.
I really think the difference is in the language. For example:
"I resolve to lose 20 lbs. in 2007!"
- the goal is a fixed place to "get" to. You're forever measuring yourself AGAINST that goal whenever you look in the mirror or get on the scale. Everything that shows up in your life from then on is something that you aren't getting to or haven't attained yet.
"I am creating the possibility of health and vitality in 2007"
- there is so much freedom in this declaration. What does health and vitality "look like" in the world? It gives us a place to stand from the viewpoint of "being". If you're "being" healthy and vital, what kinds of things are you DOing? Exercising, eating better, joining classes, getting in relationship with others? And then you'll HAVE what you want - and I bet suddenly that scale starts getting in agreement with the possibility, too!
Be...Do...Have (I'm going to BE healthy and then get out there and DO healthy things and then I'll HAVE a great body!)
So often we think it is Have...Do...Be (Once I HAVE that great body after I've DONE the 20-lb weight loss then I'll BE happy)
I ask you, which approach is more powerful? Which approach gives us more freedom and joy? Which offers a place to stand and not something to strive toward?
Just some food for thought.