AgileGSD
Who would place a dog with no one is home 24/7? Who would want a dog if they are literally gone all day, everyday?
That's literally turned what I said inside out -- my point is that they WON'T place a pug in a home where some family member is not at home round the clock -- i.e., if the wife works days the husband has to work nights, or one spouse doesn't work out of the home. Not that no one was ever home. c'mon please.
I also didn't say pugs never did well in apartments -- I said they CAN be barky, I said they CAN be clingy and mega social. I said they DO stay puppies for a long time -- mostly meaning I wouldn't recommend a puppy first of all (of ANY breed, but particularly not a pug or a breed that is difficult to housetrain -- and pugs are pretty well known to be that).
AgileGSD
the age of the Pug (usually older Pugs do just fine in an apartment), and the history of that Pug. We are less likely to place a Pug in an apartment if the applicant works long hours, or the Pug is young (a little Pug bladder can only hold it for so long)."
That IS my point -- let's not take this all out of context here. I did say SPECIFICALLY an older pug might be fine and the INDIVIDUAL would be important.
My problem is with the flat statement that a pug puppy would be great or that pugs are great apartment dogs. You seem to have turned this into some sort of an argument -- and that's not productive. David and I have worked with at least two pug rescues several states apart over the course of 3 years so I wouldn't say our experience is isolated.
ONe of the big reasons there are so many pugs IN RESCUE is, quite simply, because people adopt them because they thot "Frank" in Men in Black or the pug in Milo and Otis was cute. There are a lot of groups out there trying to promote a LOT of breeds and then people get them on a whim without any realistic idea of what to expect.
Some of you may remember a situation I was involved in about 4 months ago -- people thought they had "read all the websites" and they took a pug puppy with completely the wrong understanding. She read a lot of stuff, and a lot of glowing reports about how great they were in apartments, but she didn't apparently find much that was at all realistic. They were looking for a dog that didn't bark, didn't shed, and that would be perfect for a 2 year old as a playmate.
One of the pug rescues in town and I have worked for months with these people and it's a good thing. It's a pug still IN that home -- but they did a lot of things they didn't plan on (someone HAS stayed at home with the dog to supervise the dog & child, they HAVE gotten obedience training, but the barking and shedding is still a problem).
Folks -- let's be on the o.p's side here -- she's in a transitional period of life, and her life may change greatly in the next few years. She's looking for the dog who will be EASY in an apartment. She's already had to re-home a dog because of a problem and it broke her heart -- this should not be any sort of argument about 'breed' -- it should be constructive suggestions on what to look for or what to avoid.
It's not about what THIS apartment will allow. But what dog will make it generally easier or will be acceptable in MOST places that allow pets. They may move. And obviously training is an ongong thing.
What are the things that cause dogs to be unacceptable in an apartment?
1. Size (and that is probably across the board the BIGGEST "rule" you will find out there -- **SOME** places may accept bigger dogs but if you have a bigger dog you automatically decrease your list of places you *can* rent.
Let's be realistic here -- if you decrease your pool of 'where' you can rent, you make everything in life more complex -- how far you may have to drive to/from work, how much you may have to pay, what sort of neighborhood you live in, and even the availability of a place TO exercise the dog.
2. Behavior -- things like barking, house-broken, and destructiveness -- to a degree some of this is breed. And honestly I think we need to help her know potential pitfalls. Is EVERY beagle apartment un-friendly? No -- but a lot of them are. So whatever breed(s) she's looking for she needs to know when to be wary.
I did NOT say pugs are bad dogs (I LOVE my pug -- but she is a freaking handful in spades and I'm glad I'm not a novice dog-owner. I have never in my life had a dog quite so social who needs somebuddy to play, play, play ALL the time! MUCH of that is her age -- as pugs age they can become real couch potatos -- see AGE = big deal!!! Individual dog = big deal!!!)
REALISM -- my very first dog was not fully house-trained. I'm fortunate that I wasn't in a carpeted apartment or I flatly would have been in big trouble. Prissy was only 6 months old when I took her off the street, and she'd already had a litter -- but she had been abused and as far as she was concerned you had to hide to eliminate.
THAT doesn't make it easy on an apartment-dweller. I would *never* recommend a puppy of *any* variety to someone in an apartment who didn't have several weeks of being mostly at home (or who between them and a s.o. be able to make sure the puppy wasn't left longer than a couple of hours in order TO housetrain it).
I guess what I'm trying to say is that there are different 'tiers' of information here -- honestly I think AGE and SIZE are far more critical than breed. The *individual* dog is also far more important than any specific breed tendency. But if we're trying to give this lady some constructive help on what to look for let's not give her a bunch of glittering generalities about any one breed that may prove to be less than reliable.