Kim_MacMillan
Posted : 11/5/2007 12:58:40 PM
I think one thing to keep in mind is this.....just like with people who say "Just because we like Cesar doesn't mean we like everything he does", I think you need to treat this issue the same way. Just because some of us have a lot of respect for certain people, doesn't mean we bow down to every step of ground they walk on. The problem I have seen, almost inherently, is that people who are avid fans of Cesar can't seem to be able to say when yes, they felt he did something totally un-necessary or more harsh than it needed to be. Rather, there is a need felt to defend his actions, through thick and thin, no matter what he did, as opposed to judging each action on an "as happens" basis. I am perfectly comfortable pointing out when somebody does something I wouldn't do, or that I thought was harsh, regardless of who the person was. If you had shown me that video and I had no idea who the lady was, I would give the same result anyhow.
I also am not going to judge a person's entire philosophy on dogs on one sole 3-minute video .Granted, there are a few there, so you can gain a better impression for some of the people, but I'm actually amazed at how quickly people can jump to say "OMG she's horrible for doing ____" from ONE example, and at that an edited 3-minute clip! Talk about jumping to conclusions....lol. At least when I formed my impressions of the teaching methodologies (which is different from ideologies.....), I would watch more than one to get a consensus.
Some reviews on the videos myself:
"Tips for Handling a Reactive Dog"
- I wouldn't have used the happy voice that she did myself. At least not in the beginning. I would have reserved that for AFTER the dog was doing what I wanted. I do think that voice plays a huge role in how our dogs react, and often the dog will react based upon our voice and how we talk to them. I would have used a quieter, slower, more neutral voice at first, and then used a higher-pitched voice later.
- She did hold pressure on the leash so that the dogs feet were off the ground for a period of time, probably not what I would have done myself. As for pain, it's hard to say from a short clip, but there didn't appear to be any real pain involved. Pressure and pain aren't the same thing. What I did see, though, was that the feet off-the ground was very short-timed, in other words it appears to me she was basing that amount of pressure used directly to the dog's reactive state. The second the dog backed off she released enough pressure so that the dog was on all fours, but kept on some pressure so that the dog sat. And as soon as the dog sat - immediate release of pressure. Classic R-, and quite well executed.
Would I do that? Not likely......I'd prefer to start a lot farther away before the dog was reacting at all and classically condition a particular CER before working so close together with another dog, so I didn't set the dog up to react to begin with. However, because she's working with shelter dogs and not pet dogs, there is a difference between the amount of time you can reasonably expect to devote to each dog within a shelter environment. It's an unfortunate part of shelter life. And you can't say that Jean herself would do that as routine with non-shelter dogs either, I think that's a bit of a jump to assume that. You are given quite strict abilities within shelters, and aside from taking the more time-consuming way, which likely would have been the least stressful on the dog, I think this was a lot more humane and effective than a well-timed P+. Not because it's a "Gentle Leader", as most know I am not a huge fan of them myself, but because a P+ used in terms of dog reactivity can quickly turn a reactive dog into an aggressive one, and there is no place IMO for P+ in working with reactive dogs.
It's not something I would do with my own dogs, or that I would recommend when talking with people about their own dogs. So I wouldn't "recommend" its use.
But to take such a unique situation - shelter dog work with known behaviour problems with unknown history and limited time to work on a solution - and try to apply that to "Oh, well this is how Jean approaches all of her behaviour protocols" is a bit reaching. I would say, that given the circumstances, and given the time within she feasibly HAS to work, this was likely the most minimally aversive way to help that dog, and yes, I think it was a heck of a lot better to do what she did that to use another type of tool such as a slip collar or a prong collar with well-timed quick P+.