Cassidys Mom
Posted : 9/2/2007 1:20:10 PM
ORIGINAL: houndlove
I've heard people criticize NILIF for being too harsh and somehow cruel
Obviously they don't understand the concept. [sm=wink.gif] To me, NILIF is the antithesis of force. It's also beautifully simple, and as others have pointed out, can be used on any dog, from puppyhood on, and adapted to the circumstances. The dog always has the choice to comply, and the consequences are very clear. You want to eat dinner? Sit or down as commanded until released. Break, and you'll have to wait. Want to go for a walk? Sit calmly while the leash is put on, and then sit calmly at the door until released, or the leash gets put away and you don't get to go. Want attention? Bark your head off, jump up and down, but until you stop and sit calmly you are the invisible dog.
I start doing NILIF immediately with new puppies, and I think it prevents a lot of bad behavior from ever developing and having to be fixed later. As it turns out, my two current GSDs are pretty easy dogs, but the previous one, Cassidy, was a holy terror as a puppy. She was already 20 weeks old when we got her, a big strong puppy with no manners or training. I had to learn, FAST, how to deal with her, and NILIF was the answer. It's so easy to incorporate into everyday life so that it becomes a routine for everyone. The dogs know exactly what to expect, and so they comply without question or challenge. With Cassidy I took it a step further and did social isolation in addition to NILIF. The k9deb link that was posted has the social isolation info too. Basically I completely ignored her for two days - didn't look at her, talk to her, touch her, or acknowledge her existence in any way. She was practically doing backflips to get my attention by that point, so she was finally ready to do as I asked. For her, removal of attention was the most powerful punishment there was, so you can bet your behind I exploited that!
There was a really interesting article in the Whole Dog Journal (last year?) about leadership. It stated that ethology studies from the '70s and '80s suggest that canine social structure holds together because appeasement behaviors are offered by subordinate members, not because higher ranking members demand subservience. So training methods that encourage dogs to offer deference behaviors, and then reward them for it, are a much closer approximation of actual pack behavior than any application of force. The more they offer deferent behavior, the more deferent they become. Also, dominance established without resorting to aggression appears to be more stable than dominance maintained by constant vigilance and displays of strength. NILIF accomplishes this perfectly, by calmly controlling the good stuff.