Is aggression allowed in your pack?

    • Gold Top Dog
    And they would be correct, they not wolves, they're decedents of them


    IMHO, dogs and wolves are closely descended from a common ancestor(s). There is one theory that dogs from different parts of the world evolved from wolf like canids in those parts of the world. Example, european dogs from timberwolves, Sibes and Mals from the asian wolf type.
     
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: corvus

    You believe all aggression is the same behaviour, 
    I'd list growling and snarling and snapping and biting all as different behaviours.

     
    No, what i said is different, i know that they are different behaviors, agression does not show up in the same one all the time, i said that those behaviors are different yes but coming from the same root: aggression, just in different levels
     
    I know now what are you talking about when you say they will go straight for the bite, the situation here is that since you let your pack members being #2, #3, #4 etc that could bring fruestrations indeed, some of them can be use to be higher than others so in your food example one of them was "why he is getting privilegesif i'm higher than him?"
     
    Thats why with my dog and the ones sometimes i take care of there is no number 3, 4 or 5, they are all the same #2 and i am the only #1 inthe pack , they still have a hierarchy in the pack but they dont fight among eachother to get more privileges than others, any kind of aggression can be defused because any of them feel entitle to more privileges than others
     
    As long as you have a hierarchy between your dogs you will have aggression in some level, from snarl or growling to biting or fighting, because they cant talk to eachother and say "ok i'm higher than you, is that clear?", they need to show it when stuff like your examples happen
    • Gold Top Dog
    I don't understand how you can take a ladder hierarchy out of a pack that wants one. We've never tolerated things like stealing or bullying in our packs, but it makes no difference. They still try it on every time. I don't think they can help it, just like sometimes Penny can't help barking even when she knows I don't want it and I'm going to make her sit quietly before she gets what she wants so much that she's barking for the excitement of it. I watch her try so hard to suppress those barks and she can't. To me, it's like trying to teach a dog not to wag his tail. Maybe you can get across to him that you don't like him to express himself that way, but I think you'd have to be reminding him constantly because it's so natural, and I think it would be confusing to the dog.

    I've already said that I can understand when you might need to insist on no signs of aggression whatsoever. I wonder, though, if Cesar's dogs sort themselves out when they're unsupervised. I wonder if he ALWAYS insists on no signs of aggression, or only in times when it could easily turn ugly.

    I also don't understand how you can refuse to acknowledge a pack order but still have a hierarchy, and yet have no aggression between dogs. Huh? Our top dog doesn't really get special treatment. He doesn't even get fed first, to be honest. He doesn't get first pats when we come home. He doesn't get more food or toys. He doesn't get to make any choices for the rest of the pack. He still has to abide by all the rules that the other two do. The "special treatment" he gets is only that he's allowed to tell the others when he's irritated with them. The others are allowed to tell him when they're irritated with him, too, but they don't unless he's being really obnoxious, because he's higher ranking than them. We didn't make him the highest ranking dog. He did that himself in much the same way that we make ourselves the highest ranking pack members. The only difference is that he gets aggressive when the other dogs don't respect his position and we just get firm. Maybe that's not a difference at all. Pyry did not go for Penny because she was getting privileges. She wasn't. She never got to his food. He went for her because she was not respecting his position. No one was getting anything that the other didn't get.

    I've never been in a multi-dog household that didn't have a clear ladder hierarchy, and therefore, didn't have the odd scuffle. I can't imagine having more than one dog and not having some kind of obvious hierarchy. It's a dog's inherent nature, and it's why I love them.
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: corvus

    I don't understand how you can take a ladder hierarchy out of a pack that wants one. We've never tolerated things like stealing or bullying in our packs, but it makes no difference. They still try it on every time. I don't think they can help it, just like sometimes Penny can't help barking even when she knows I don't want it and I'm going to make her sit quietly before she gets what she wants so much that she's barking for the excitement of it. I watch her try so hard to suppress those barks and she can't. To me, it's like trying to teach a dog not to wag his tail. Maybe you can get across to him that you don't like him to express himself that way, but I think you'd have to be reminding him constantly because it's so natural, and I think it would be confusing to the dog.

    I've already said that I can understand when you might need to insist on no signs of aggression whatsoever. I wonder, though, if Cesar's dogs sort themselves out when they're unsupervised. I wonder if he ALWAYS insists on no signs of aggression, or only in times when it could easily turn ugly.

    I also don't understand how you can refuse to acknowledge a pack order but still have a hierarchy, and yet have no aggression between dogs. Huh? Our top dog doesn't really get special treatment. He doesn't even get fed first, to be honest. He doesn't get first pats when we come home. He doesn't get more food or toys. He doesn't get to make any choices for the rest of the pack. He still has to abide by all the rules that the other two do. The "special treatment" he gets is only that he's allowed to tell the others when he's irritated with them. The others are allowed to tell him when they're irritated with him, too, but they don't unless he's being really obnoxious, because he's higher ranking than them. We didn't make him the highest ranking dog. He did that himself in much the same way that we make ourselves the highest ranking pack members. The only difference is that he gets aggressive when the other dogs don't respect his position and we just get firm. Maybe that's not a difference at all. Pyry did not go for Penny because she was getting privileges. She wasn't. She never got to his food. He went for her because she was not respecting his position. No one was getting anything that the other didn't get.

    I've never been in a multi-dog household that didn't have a clear ladder hierarchy, and therefore, didn't have the odd scuffle. I can't imagine having more than one dog and not having some kind of obvious hierarchy. It's a dog's inherent nature, and it's why I love them.



    Well if you love to have your pack that way is ok, i am different, they still have a ladder and that ladder just have 2 steps, #1 and #2

    That way works for me, i have no fights, no one has to let the others to stop being obnoxious because they know i dont like when they are (or i let them) in first place.

    Thats the part of boundries in discipline, boundries and limitations; you let your dogs know that they cant be obnoxious with other dogs, they know that they have to respect other dogs personal space, they know they cant touch other dog's food

    I am the only one that can set the discipline in my pack, if i "delegate" that job to others sometimes then i am going to have aggression

    Barking for excitement is different than barking for aggression, barking for aggression is the one that is not tolerated, other kinds are fine depending the situation and how long they last (i'm not going to let them bark for 30 minutes for excitement either)

    But like i said thats my pack, it works like a charm, they are relaxed because they dont have to worry about other pack members behavior, they know i will be there to handle any member that forgets the boundries, i can say they trust me 100% [:D]
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: Awsomedog



    ORIGINAL: ron2



    Some trainers say dogs are not wolves.


    And they would be correct, they not wolves, they're decedents of them.






    Neotenized ones, at that.
    • Gold Top Dog
    I'm listening, espencer, and I'm considering it, I'm just finding it difficult to believe. Mostly because I'm not there to watch the pack a lot of the time. I believe that you can suppress aggression entirely, but I imagine that it would make being pack leader a full-time job, because you're forcing your dogs to behave unnaturally. I'm pretty certain no wolf alpha would bother intervening in an argument between two betas just to insist that the alpha is the only one allowed to tell other wolves off when they're being obnoxious. My point with the excited barking was that it's very hard to suppress because my dog can't help it. Similarly, I think my dog can't help snarling when she's telling another dog to back off. Or more to the point, she can't help telling another dog to back off, just like she can't help grumbling at me when she doesn't really like what I'm doing. Grumbling is like a passive growl, but is not a warning, just an expression.

    The other thing is when we're out and about. I still think it's important my dog be able to tell a strange dog to back off. The strange dog has no tie to me and is not necessarily going to listen to me. Additionally, strange dogs are harder to read, so I don't know if they're just naturally tense meeting another dog, or if they're tense because they're feeling like they might have a little aggressive display. Penny does know. To me, it's a better idea to allow her to communicate with the strange dog than to step in and say "I know he's standing too close, but you mustn't tell him that." I've tried telling strange dogs that they're too close to Penny, and they don't always know what I'm saying. They always know what Penny is saying, though.

    Do your dogs let strange dogs be rude to them because they expect you to take care of it? If I lived like that, I'd be taking care of things for my dog all the time.
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: spiritdogs

    ORIGINAL: Awsomedog



    ORIGINAL: ron2



    Some trainers say dogs are not wolves.


    And they would be correct, they not wolves, they're decedents of them.






    Neotenized ones, at that.


     
    Doo-doo. [:D]
    • Gold Top Dog
    ^ LOL^
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: corvus

    I'm listening, espencer, and I'm considering it, I'm just finding it difficult to believe. Mostly because I'm not there to watch the pack a lot of the time. I believe that you can suppress aggression entirely, but I imagine that it would make being pack leader a full-time job, because you're forcing your dogs to behave unnaturally. I'm pretty certain no wolf alpha would bother intervening in an argument between two betas just to insist that the alpha is the only one allowed to tell other wolves off when they're being obnoxious. My point with the excited barking was that it's very hard to suppress because my dog can't help it. Similarly, I think my dog can't help snarling when she's telling another dog to back off. Or more to the point, she can't help telling another dog to back off, just like she can't help grumbling at me when she doesn't really like what I'm doing. Grumbling is like a passive growl, but is not a warning, just an expression.

    The other thing is when we're out and about. I still think it's important my dog be able to tell a strange dog to back off. The strange dog has no tie to me and is not necessarily going to listen to me. Additionally, strange dogs are harder to read, so I don't know if they're just naturally tense meeting another dog, or if they're tense because they're feeling like they might have a little aggressive display. Penny does know. To me, it's a better idea to allow her to communicate with the strange dog than to step in and say "I know he's standing too close, but you mustn't tell him that." I've tried telling strange dogs that they're too close to Penny, and they don't always know what I'm saying. They always know what Penny is saying, though.

    Do your dogs let strange dogs be rude to them because they expect you to take care of it? If I lived like that, I'd be taking care of things for my dog all the time.


     
    Like i said before, dogs are more simple than humans, you dont have to be next to them 24/7, once they know the rules from left to right and from up to down they will follow your "pack philosophy", they dont need a babysitter
     
    They dont behave unnaturally by doing that, is just a pack with different rules, just like any family has different rules does not mean they are not acting as humans, i even think is less stress for the dogs, they dont have to worry about be the ones setting the discipline, boundries and limitations to other members
     
    Is not that your dogs cant help being like this or like that, they only dont know that you would rather for them to behave in another way
     
    Strange dog situations: Dogs (like we have discuss before) read body lenguage and "read" better what kind of attitude the other dog is having, if you have your dog calm all the time then the strage dog will get that your dog is not a threat for him and like John Lennon said he will only "let it be" [;)], if your dog is aggressive at one moment and tell the strange dog to "back off" since we dont know how the strange dog reacts he might as well be aggressive back, if i think the dog is too close to mine i just change the leash from one hand to the other, if you dont ackoledge the strange dog he will do the same, if your dog does you just redirect his attention, just like when you dont want to meet every person that walks in the same street as you the strange dog niether. You cant control other dogs but you can make your dog be calm, is like not providing the match when the gasoline is there [;)]
     
    If my dog is calm is mostly sure the strange dog will be also and wont be rude, i dont think my dog would be having a happy walk if he has to take care of every rude dog, if i'm there to take care of the situation (since i have more knowledge than my dog about what to doin which situation) then my dog can feel relaxed
     
    What kind of situation involves your dog with a rude one?
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: espencer

    Is not that your dogs cant help being like this or like that, they only dont know that you would rather for them to behave in another way


    See, that's where my problem is. My dog KNOWS I don't like excitable barking. She can suppress it to a certain point, but every single morning before we go for a walk, at some point her restraint slips and she lets out a little bark, or a string of barks. I know she's trying not to do it because she's tense and her bottom lip quivers and she pants her excitement. When she barks, I say "AGH!" and if she barks more than once I make her sit beside me and we don't walk until she's calm. She'll wait at the open door in a sit on a loose lead until I say she can go despite how excited and eager she is, but she just can't keep those barks in. I used to try to stop her grumbling at me, too. She can know I don't like it but still it comes out, almost against her will. I'm pretty sure it would be the same story with growls and snarls and snaps at other dogs. She knows and she tries, but she can't seem to deny something that's so natural and inborn in herself. Knowing the rules does not always automatically mean they are obeyed. Like I said in the food stealing example, we NEVER tolerate food stealing, and the dogs know we don't, but it doesn't stop them from trying it from time to time.


    Strange dog situations: Dogs (like we have discuss before) read body lenguage and "read" better what kind of attitude the other dog is having, if you have your dog calm all the time then the strage dog will get that your dog is not a threat for him and like John Lennon said he will only "let it be" [;)], if your dog is aggressive at one moment and tell the strange dog to "back off" since we dont know how the strange dog reacts he might as well be aggressive back, if i think the dog is too close to mine i just change the leash from one hand to the other, if you dont ackoledge the strange dog he will do the same, if your dog does you just redirect his attention, just like when you dont want to meet every person that walks in the same street as you the strange dog niether. You cant control other dogs but you can make your dog be calm, is like not providing the match when the gasoline is there [;)]

    If my dog is calm is mostly sure the strange dog will be also and wont be rude, i dont think my dog would be having a happy walk if he has to take care of every rude dog, if i'm there to take care of the situation (since i have more knowledge than my dog about what to doin which situation) then my dog can feel relaxed

    What kind of situation involves your dog with a rude one?


    Well, I don't know about that. The strange dogs that I meet tend to be offlead with no owners around. Sometimes they just want to be friends and sometimes they're signalling aggression right off the mark the moment they see us. I think my dog responds to their signals, rather than causing their signals. I don't think I could convince my dog to be calm when faced with a dog she doesn't read as calm. She's very aware of how small she is and most of these dogs are quite large. If she's scared of them and reads them to be seriously aggressive, she hides behind me and I take care of it. If she's not scared of them, or if she's confident she can handle them, she doesn't hide. Often handling them means letting them touch noses with her, but snapping at their noses if they try to move into her space or sniff under her tail before she's ready for it. They generally step back and give her space. If they don't, and she starts to think she was wrong about handling them, she'll run behind me again and I take care of it. She's a very well socialised dog and she's quite confident despite being attacked a couple of times by loose dogs. She doesn't start arguments with strange dogs, even when they're rude, but she sure tells them that they're rude. I've never seen a fight break out because she's snapped at a dog's nose for getting too close to her. It just doesn't seem to happen.

    Basically, I think it's important that she learn how to deal with rude or pushy dogs herself. She's the dog, not me, and she's better at dealing with them than I am. She's quicker to read, more accurate, and she communicates way more efficiently. She learnt the basics when she was a pup at training school and the likes, but the rest she has learnt by encountering rude dogs and learning what to do through trial and error. I often see people walking their dogs and they don't allow them to meet with other dogs. They pick them up or cross the road to walk away from us. Those dogs seem both poorly socialised and desperate to come and say hello. Our dogs are very well socialised and usually ignore the other dogs, but I feel they learnt to do that by being allowed to interact with strange dogs with a fair amount of freedom. Maybe they just respond to our calmness, but then, we're calm because we know our dogs will be able to handle just about anything.

    In conclusion, I can see how it could be done, but I don't think it would work in our pack. And I think I wouldn't want it to. Dogs are a social carnivore, which means they have social rank. I like that about dogs. It's interesting and I learn a lot from it, both about dog body language and about what's natural for dogs. Our dogs have had the odd barney that's been pretty serious, but even so, the worst damage they've ever inflicted on each other has been a nick on the ear or a minor scratch on the back of the neck. To me, that's not such a huge risk that I have to interfere with the way the dogs naturally organise themselves in order to stop it from ever happening. I don't know anyone else locally who insists on no aggression, either, so why should I make my dogs put up with things they don't like from dogs not in my pack when not putting up with it actually keeps the peace rather than starting fights?


    • Gold Top Dog
    Hole moly this is one long thread, so instead of trying to read the whole thing, which I'll never have time to do. No, no unreasonable aggression is allowed in my pack.
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: Awsomedog

    Hole moly this is one long thread, so instead of trying to read the whole thing, which I'll never have time to do. No, no unreasonable aggression is allowed in my pack.


    Define "unreasonable"? What I'm trying to get to the bottom of is whether people's dogs are free to tell each other with growls or snarls or the odd snap when they don't like something another dog is doing. In other words, do you stamp out aggression the very moment it creeps into a dog's body language, or do you only step in when you read the situation as serious, such as when there's a good chance aggression will escalate beyond control into violence?
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: corvus

    ORIGINAL: Awsomedog

    Hole moly this is one long thread, so instead of trying to read the whole thing, which I'll never have time to do. No, no unreasonable aggression is allowed in my pack.


    Define "unreasonable"? What I'm trying to get to the bottom of is whether people's dogs are free to tell each other with growls or snarls or the odd snap when they don't like something another dog is doing. In other words, do you stamp out aggression the very moment it creeps into a dog's body language, or do you only step in when you read the situation as serious, such as when there's a good chance aggression will escalate beyond control into violence?



    Ohhh I like this one, and will give two answers. Most people watching Cesaer's show may have even missed it. He was feeding the dogs and invited the calmest dog to come up first. It was the pit who's name escapes me at the moment. While he was talking, another dog came up to the pits bowl and the pit gave a low growl, which Cesar not only did not correct him, he actually made the other dog move back. A second later he invited up a the next calmest who stood and ate right next to the pit with no reaction. Now looking at that from my point of view would be that, like me, I as the pit had the right to warn the dog to back off from his food, and as pack leader Cesar stepped in and agreed.

    For me unreasonable aggression is when teeth are involved. Does that help to clear things up a little?