spiritdogs
Posted : 9/8/2006 7:09:08 AM
I think that if you are seriously thinking about rehoming your dog, you need to make your "rescuer" aware of the dog's health issues, lest that person simply be saddled with getting to love a dog, then finding out that they must pay through the nose to do what you are unwilling to do.
And, since, again, your decision seems to be a financial one, and you are only too willing to listen to only one vet, and not do allergy testing (which may not be the solution, but it's a chance I would take), then perhaps Snowball is better off somewhere else anyway.
Bloodwork is not only done to detect disease, it's done so that your vet would have a baseline to refer to. Most people don't bother - I do. But, I can understand why your vet might not suggest it, or the allergy shots - if you have made comments about the expense, he might be trying to save you some cash. That means, however, that your dog will receive treatments aimed at symptoms, so that you will be happy he isn't mutilating, which, since you have not addressed a root cause, he still is. What it also means is that any extraordinary means of testing will probably be ignored, which you have just said you plan to do.
As to whether your area is a "valley of sickness" or not, frankly, that doesn't matter - you are simply using that as a justification not to treat the dog. And, despite that, he may move to another area not so "sick" but which has the same allergen that triggers his worst response - since you have not bothered to try to find out what that is.
Instead of being aggressive about finding an answer for the dog, your vet may be feeding off your reluctance to spend more time and money, and you are only too willing to go along with him not being aggressive so that you can say "my vet said..." as a justification for giving up. Shame on you. At least call a spade a spade and take responsibility for your unwillingness to go further.