calliecritturs
Posted : 12/18/2011 5:52:42 PM
blur411
I'm looking into the NILIF. My boyfriend and I have decided if there is one more scuffle, even if it is small we will try that.
.To be honest? It doesn't take a "scuffle" to do NILIF -- it is the WAY OF LIFE at our house. And I really have no behavior problems -- and you humans have to be really strict with yourselves as well -- if one of you is giving a command or in control of a situation, let that person finish it. It's hard not to counter-mand each other.
Mostly tho I really want to encourage you to completely ditch your own human feelings of "fairness" -- just because Dog A has been here longer doesn't mean that dog should **always** have access to couch, bed, etc. That is always a priviledge -- ANY dog in my house who begins to ignore me or be a problem - they are busted to the floor (as in "busted" = denial of priviledge, not physical punishment)
You can't look at it as Well X has been here longer than Y so he has more perks.
Nope -- everyone has to earn everything -- we humans do that -- if WE don't work WE don't eat. Our "reward" system is just different. I mean if one of you gets a new "toy" (game, Kindle, whatever) and starts treating the other person like crap -- well guess what -- it's gonna cause problems.
You changed things when you brought in another dog -- and you *knew* the terrier was capable of being snarky. So you honestly have to take responsibility and arrange **everything** to produce the best possible reactions in both.
If the "resource" (bed, nylabone, you, whatever) is a problem -- then re-arrange things so the problem can't happen. This may break the nose of the humans -- because we tend to like to judge everything by our own rules of "fair". So honestly, you have to begin to see things more from the dogs' standpoints --
Dogs are 100% situational. Right here, right now we're best buddies and we like the closeness of laying together -- but if that 'resource' shows up -- they're going to revert straight back to what works.
A dog doesn't lie around and think 'Oh ... it's nice -- we're getting along so much better now -- I won't lose my temper any more'. They are in the "now". Right now I'm comfortable. But if A and B react to some new resource or stimulous "getting along" isn't part of **their** plan.
To hold them to OUR standards and think "Oh they're getting along so well now I can invite A up on the bed".... nope - if YOU change the situation by allowing something new to come in, it's honestly more you than the dogs and you may set yourself way back training-wise.
Does that make any sense? In other words -- until there is long long LONG and successful training where you diminish a certain negative/not-desired resonse you can't even think of not avoiding problems. And even so -- with some dogs you may never be able to put them in certain situations and not potentially explode the whole thing all over again.
Any time you bring another dog into your pack, you potentially change *everything*. Pleasures you may have had -- having the terrier up next to you on the bed, or whatever ... you may not be able to do those things now.
But honestly --you have to think more like a dog (or at least mentally be far more able to put yourself IN their place) to get this to work. You have to delete words from your own vocabulary like "fair" and "sharing" -- because they just aren't dog concepts. They may "share" a toy simply because one doesn't *want* it right now, or it's not that attractive. But that can turn on a dime if certain events/wants are strung together.
I'm not trying to be snarky -- Jackie and Jewilee are absolutely on target with what they suggest. I guess what I was trying to add was how important it is for us to adjust *our* mental ideas and goals because sometimes we assume they're 'getting along' when it's really just that nothing has been desirable enough and there haven't been events that may have triggered that "short fuse" that sometimes seems to come out of nowhere. (or maybe you just didn't see them) So you sort of have to simply permanently change how you do certain things in order to not "set them up" to fail.