calliecritturs
Posted : 7/12/2013 8:39:10 AM
Jackie raises super good points -- I can imagine it CAN be "both ways". Simply because the needs of the people who 'need' a service dog can vary so widely AND you get different theories of training in the different agencies and programs.
You won't just need to comply with the ADA (and frankly it should ONLY be the ADA but it is not) but you will also have to comply with whatever your state's own requirements are for service dogs.
I know in Luis Montalvan's book "Until Tuesday" one of the things he discusses at the beginning of the book is the various agencies and pretty much exactly what your question is. I don't have the book in front of me but I think he gives references -- at least to the organization he used.
Given that I have some serious healtlh issues, having a service dog is something I've often thought about so I understand your question only too well. I think if it were *me* making the decison, I would be trying the existing agencies first, and then if you just don't "gel" with any agency you can always fall back on training your own dog.
I know simply within the parameters of certifying agencies for Therapy dogs (my husband and I do a lot of pet assisted therapy) there is a huge disparity in what is expected from one to another. There are a couple of agencies I wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pole, and another I have recently had a bad experience with (and it seems to be one everyone else likes). But I can promise you that you will find each one very different when you actually try to begin to work with them.
Another thing -- just after re-reading your post -- give careful thought to the *source* you are dealng with. If someone says "don't bother with a program-trained dog - do it yourself" strongly consider that source. Is that person going to have difficulty submitting to the human-training that is requisite for an assistance dog? And if those people have had what *they perceive* as a bad experience, they may then also be the type to be extremely vocal about what they didn't like. That may or may not make it "valid" -- but rather it may simply be that THEY were wrong for a program.
Then you will have to be pretty rugged with yourself in evaluating if YOU will have the same sort of problem submitting to the training a program may require in order to match you with a dog. If you are already under a doctor's care, I would also consider their recommendation strongly. They will likely tell you plainly if they really think it would be good ... or not good ... for you to submit to program training. Did that make sense?