ron2
Posted : 10/19/2008 8:59:29 AM
dyan
I was concerned about the change of ownership at Eagle...gee with the fact that a few others sold out and the food went on the the "food to not feed" list..... And having not heard that they were sold before I wrote to Eagle. This is the reply from John.
Keep in mind that some family owned companies do not make their own foods and some are made in plants that have had 3 recalls. Again you are welcome to post this. In fact it would be nice if you would.
Take care,
John
He raises a good point. Some of the foods that can't afford their own food plant time-share, for lack of a better word, at Solid Gold facilities and have had QC issues. Such as TOTW and Solid Gold, to think of a few. And all the food companies had a scare with Menu Foods, regardless of their ownership, thanks to Menu Foods having tainted shipments from China. I understand all too well that business must earn a profit to remain viable and sometimes, that means finding a good price on ingredients. I also understand, as both a consumer as well as someone who has to work with gc mgmt and clients in the construction industry that you also have to maintain a good relationship with the public that buys your product or uses your service. And you want them to be happy and trusting in what you do. So, as long as the product stays what you need it to be and the QC remains high, then it may not matter so much who signs the checks, as long as they cash.
As for price, for example, we were not the lowest electrical bidder on this project. But we got the job because we have a reputation of building this kind of school well and on time and knowing what we're doing. So, hiring us is an assurance that the job will be done right the first time and on time, even if another company had a lower price. We often have a saying that a company that drastically underbids us, and we are competitive in pricing, has drastically missed something that would place that other company in financial jeopardy later. So, part of the assurance of hiring us is the knowledge that our office and owner have the business savvy to operate our business correctly and at a profit, something that the owner has to prove to the insurance and completion bond companies. Our boss has a boss, even though it is a privately owned company, owned solely by the one owner.
In that same vein, so to speak, a food company has to operate effectively and at a profit, while not losing QC and providing the products that we, the consumers, need and want. And, to meet EP's needs, I will pay what price they charge because I need the food to be what it is for my dog, and not necessarily the cheapest food per pound. It's more important to me that EP maintain what they are doing than to save a dime. Another old saying. Sometimess, you get what you pay for. As my employer would say, also, make sure you get what you pay for.
I'm fine with EP's price. I'm fairly certain I couldn't beat that price with homecooking. Though I may still do the latter, as well. But I think, as long as EP doesn't change the formulas to drastically, that I can feed him this food a long time, as well.