cc431
Posted : 1/28/2008 1:37:10 AM
[quote user="corgipower"]
True, and I hadn't thought of tripe. But tripe isn't something to be gotten from all animals. I haven't researched the source, but I find this article rather interesting. I'm open to anyone who wants to tell me that the source is unreliable though. This is the page on eating stomach contents ~ http://rawfed.com/myths/stomachcontents.html [/quote]
Hello Corgipower,
Here is a quote from the Abady articles I dug for you. It goes along with the myth theory, and here is how it all got started. Then again, you know many feel it is hogwash because of the source and part of some sort of cult mythology with no peer-review grant money to back it up. It is all so snake-oil like and so hard to believe that people actually profess this kind of stuff....how dare they buck system. Must be sheer nonsense and utter absurdity that people even write this kind of stuff....so anti-establihment...it's just unbelievable.
Abady Article excerpt, Raw Diets for Dogs and Cats:
The problem with the current raw diets is that most of them are primarily composed of plant matter which is indigestible to the dog (and cat), even though it is well known that feeding raw plant matter exclusively to dogs will result in starvation, because dogs do not produce the enzymes needed to break down cellulose (there are many other reasons as well).
In the 50s, the largest producer of dry diets circulated an absurd notion that dogs consumed mostly the plant matter contained in the internal organs of their prey, justifying the production of kibble composed mostly of highly processed grain. This mistake is now being applied to try to justify the use of voluminous amounts of raw vegetables which are included in today’s raw diets. Grain can be used by dogs if it is highly processed. Raw vegetables cannot, regardless of whether they are masticated by the animal or ground mechanically. In addition, the pulp produced is not suitable to the feeding of carnivores.
In short, while raw diets are supposed to prevent the problems created by commercial kibble, the concept of them, as it is elaborated today by companies other than Abady, is so faulty that their remedial effects are put in doubt.
CC.