ron2
Posted : 12/22/2006 8:07:56 PM
Thanks for the props, Rebecca.
In my trade, the smart boss picks a job boss that has both the required license and the experience to handle the job.
It's not uncommon for many people to trust the word of an experienced person over a list of creds. Or, vice versa, respect creds, as those are often based on some kind of testing of hard knowledge. For example, when I go to an interview, I bring along the statement I received from the ICC of how I passed my master exam some years ago. I do this to show that I got it the hard way. I put in my time, I cracked the book (NEC) and took a skull busting test. Though, to be honest, when I took it, it was common sensical to me, though tedious. But I'm an average guy. Anyone can pass it if they pay attention. But having a license doesn't always equal practical experience. I knew a guy who passed his journeyman's exam first time, before he even had enough time to qualify but he didn't know some of the basic things of our trade, in day to day practice. And I've known guys that did it for 20 to 25 years without a journeyman's license and their work is excellent every time, the first time, and they may even have memorized sections of the NEC. The difference is who passed that one test.
When it comes to diagnosing a pet, 9 times out of 10, I'm going to go to the vet, even if I have received good advice, here. Example, a number of people here have had excellent experience feeding raw, nary a problem. I still won't do it, and my vet agrees with me. When Shadow was having sneezing fits on Innova and I put him back on Nutro and the sneezing fits went away, I left it at that. I could have gone to the vet and he might have said, put him back on the food before, if he wasn't having a problem with that. Nor am I hell-bent on having Shadow eat what "I think he ought to eat." Feeding him is about him, not me. So, I wouldn't feel like putting him on a food that I might think is great and then put him through allergy tests and remedies, etc, at added expense, as well, to see why he's having these symptoms when he didn't have them on the original food.
As for whether or not some of us here have the medical expertise to diagnose a dog, it wouldn't matter if we did. The dog should still go to the vet, if the situation warrants it.
Scenario, I keep feeding Innova because it looks really good and everyone else recommends it and I want to the best for Shadow. He gets sneezing fits, 12 to 15 in a row, several times a day. I go to the vet to see about allergy test. Vet says, well lets review the history. What has changed in his environment? Food. Well, try him on the old food and see if the symptoms persist. If that doesn't work, then we'll test him.
Reality, I avoided the vet trip, switched back to his previous food, the symptom went away. So, I used some common sense on my part, as opposed to seeking a professional opinion. I'm not the only one here to do that. And I would think, rather than get caught up in technical definitions that would be beyond most people's experience here, we should just concentrate on whether a situation warrants a vet visit, or not.
As for technical explanations, don't make me whip the the explanation, math included (both spherical trigonometry and Pythagora's Theorem) as to why you have to use the square root of 3 in a 3-phase power calculation. I will make your eyes glass over.[

]