griffinej5
Posted : 10/28/2011 10:14:50 PM
Honestly, a set number is something I don't always pin down across the
board for all animals I'm working with (and I say animals and mean
both human and other animals). One of the ones that I might use fairly
frequently though is that if I come back the next day, and the animal
picks right back up where we left off, we're ready to move on if it's
something more complex that I might be doing across many days. If I'm
going to shape it pretty quickly, I might really not allow for more than
3-5 trials with any particular response requirement. If you go on too
long at a certain requirement, they start to think that's the terminal
response. To the same end, I won't allow more than that many successive
failures. That also shuts the animal down. So, you go back to the last point of success.
If
you really want to know exactly when to start getting rid of the
clicker, and thinning out your schedule of reinforcement, you can make
it a data based decision, though I never do with my non-human animals. I
would say at a more general level, if I have performance that is
maintained with no practice over a period of time [could be a day, could
be a week gap- I would make my decision based on what type of gap I
will be dealing with when I have completed training (if my animal will
do it at least daily, like sit, I use one day, if he will do it weekly,
I use one week, if it's less frequent I would still stop there)].
Also, if you need the behavior in multiple in environments, and I assume
you do and will need it in novel environments, test that too. For me,
once I have good performance maintained over time and across
environments, then start thinning the schedule of reinforcement. I'm thinking for the type of skills you are training, this performance maintenance over time without practice and across novel environments are going to be critical things (I'm not totally familiar with SAR, but I am under the assumption she must be able to perform in novel environments).