Natura Settlement,

    • Gold Top Dog

    Natura Settlement,

    I think quite a few here use and recommend these foods. I guess you only know what a label tells you or a rep tells you...no way to know if it's actually true or not, unless you have a home chemistry kit LOL. Maybe you are owed something??

     

    LINKAGE

    • Gold Top Dog

    I actually got an email regarding the class action suite.  I opted in.  While it isn't a huge amount of money I don't like being misled when it comes to the health of my crew.

    • Gold Top Dog
    What do you need to do to prove you bought their products? Rascal ate EVO for a few months, but I certainly didn't save sales receipts or anything...
    • Gold Top Dog

    Nothing at all.  Just tell them where and when you purchased the food.  Here's the email I got with the links to opt in.

    If you purchased Innova, EVO, California Natural, HealthWise, Mother Nature, or
    Karma dog or cat food you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

     

     

    A $2,150,000 settlement has been reached with Natura Pet Products, Inc., Natura Pet Food, Inc., Natura Manufacturing and Peter Atkins ("Defendants" or "Natura";) in a class action lawsuit about the advertising of Natura brand dog and cat food. Natura denies all of the claims in the lawsuit, but has agreed to the settlement to avoid the cost and burden of a trial.  

    Who is included? If you received this by email or mail, you are probably included. Generally, the settlement includes anyone in the U.S. who purchased Natura brand dog or cat food products anytime between March 20, 2005 and July 8, 2011. Together these people are called a "Class" or "Class Members."  

    What does the settlement provide? The maximum payment you can get is $200. A $2,150,000 settlement fund will be created by Natura. After paying attorneys fees of up to 35% of the fund and costs and expenses of up to $60,000 to the lawyers representing the Class; the costs associated with administering the settlement of up to $400,000; and up to $20,000 to the Class Representative (Judy Ko), payments will be made to Class Members who submit valid claim forms.

    How do you ask for a payment? Submit a claim online, at www.petproductsSettlement.com, using the claim number and password information above or by mail by calling 1-888-768-2047. The deadline to submit or mail your proof of claim form is January 8, 2012.

    What are your options? You have a choice about whether to stay in the Class or not. If you submit a claim form or do nothing, you are choosing to stay in the Class. This means you will be legally bound by all orders and judgments of the Court, and you will not be able to sue or continue to sue Natura about the legal claims resolved by this settlement. If you stay in the Class you may object to the settlement. You or your own lawyer may also ask to appear and speak at the hearing, at your own cost, but you don't have to. The deadline to submit objections and requests to appear is December 28, 2011. If you do not want to stay in the Class, you must submit a request for exclusion by December 28, 2011. If you exclude yourself, you cannot get a payment from this settlement, but you will keep any rights to sue Natura for the same claims in a different lawsuit. The detailed notice explains how to exclude yourself, object and request to appear.

    The court's fairness hearing. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California will hold a hearing in this case (Ko v. Natura Pet Products, Inc., No. 5:09cv2619), on February 17, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. to consider whether to approve: the settlement; attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses; and the payment to the Class Representative. If the settlement is approved, it will release the Defendants from all claims in the Settlement Agreement.

    HOW DO YOU GET MORE INFORMATION? To get a copy of the detailed notice or settlement agreement or to learn more, visit www.PetProductsSettlement.com or call 1-888-768-2047.

    The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has ordered that this email notice be sent. If you wish to UNSUBSCRIBE from future email messages from the Claims Administrator with regard to this settlement, please click here.

     

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    You can be sure that the attorneys will be the ones who benefit the most from this settlement.  The whole thing bothers me for many reasons.  Please note that Natura denies the claims but is settling to avoid the costs involved with going to trial.  This happens to many companies and we, the consumers, pay for these settlements in higher prices.  It's one thing if a product has caused an injury or illness but this lawsuit has nothing to do with anything other than the alleged misrepresentation of the food grade used in the products. 

    I've been feeding Evo for years now and it's a good food, IMO. 

    • Gold Top Dog

     I also received an e-mail about the suit, but I'm not going to file a claim.

    JackieG
    The whole thing bothers me for many reasons.  Please note that Natura denies the claims but is settling to avoid the costs involved with going to trial.  This happens to many companies and we, the consumers, pay for these settlements in higher prices.  It's one thing if a product has caused an injury or illness but this lawsuit has nothing to do with anything other than the alleged misrepresentation of the food grade used in the products. 

     

      I agree.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Class-action settlement lawyers go where big money is to be made and can build a whole case out of a misplaced comma. While some of those suits have valid grounds, I think this one is frivolous. It only came out about a year after P&G bought Natura out from its founders. P&G is, in my mind, settling to avoid negative publicity, not because the foundations of the suit are legitimate. Which does not mean that the Natura products of the future will be of the same quality as the ones of the past but only time will tell about that.

    • Gold Top Dog

     I agree that the only ones who make anything on this are lawyers, but I still have some icky feelings about the fact that labeling may not have been accurate, and that all the while, my dogs were eating this stuff.  I gave it up once they were sold to P&G, who have a reputation for crap food already (remember, their foods WERE on the recall list during the melamine incidents).  But, we were all convinced that Natura was better than that.  It would be nice to think they were, and that this is just fantasy, but how do we know?  Unless you have some of the old food and could analyze it accurately for content...and anyway, who wants to have to do that??????? Why can't companies just be honest?  Or, produce a quality product that people can trust and they can take pride in?  I can live with higher price and shrinking bag size.  I don't like the idea of living with lies, if that's what happened.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    spiritdogs

     I agree that the only ones who make anything on this are lawyers, but I still have some icky feelings about the fact that labeling may not have been accurate, and that all the while, my dogs were eating this stuff.  I gave it up once they were sold to P&G, who have a reputation for crap food already (remember, their foods WERE on the recall list during the melamine incidents).  But, we were all convinced that Natura was better than that.  It would be nice to think they were, and that this is just fantasy, but how do we know?  Unless you have some of the old food and could analyze it accurately for content...and anyway, who wants to have to do that??????? Why can't companies just be honest?  Or, produce a quality product that people can trust and they can take pride in?  I can live with higher price and shrinking bag size.  I don't like the idea of living with lies, if that's what happened.

     

    Agreed Anne, I also find it interesting that if the exact same thing had happened with another brand the fallout here would be quite different. Less excuse making and more condemnation I am thinking. Sure this company HAD a spotless rep...but if that rep was perhaps based in lies how does it make them any better?

    Bottom line is you might have been lied to, but you won't ever know if you were because they do not say...they settled. I think in some of the other recalls..apologies were issued and culpability was delivered...even if late. EVERY company would balk at their dirty little secrets being aired out, because they ALL have them. In this case? The settlement makes me wonder more than feel any better. 

    Diamond's recall encompassed some pretty high end brands because Diamond does some high end brands bagging as I understand. It was not and is not just "schlock" foods that have had issues, Merrick, TOTW both for ex have been discussed here as having quality control issues or lack of transparency issues with their customers.

    I don't get it.

    • Gold Top Dog

    spiritdogs
    if that's what happened.

     

    Exactly.  

    • Gold Top Dog
        I think it's possible that Natura has been using high quality ingredients as it claims, but was violating California law by saying they were human grade ingredients;

    Natura Pet Products Class Action Settlement Of Innova, EVO, California Natural, HealthWise, Mother Nature & Karma Dog or Cat Food Product Class Action Lawsuit | Class Action Lawsuits In The News

     A federal judge has entered an order for preliminary approval of a class action settlement of a class action lawsuit against Natura Pet Products, Inc. (“Natura Pet Products” or “Natura” or “Defendant”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (captioned Judy Ko v. Natura Pet Prodcuts, Inc., Civil Action Case No. C 09-02619 JF), alleging, among other things, that Natura violated California’s Business and Professions Code when advertising their dog and cat food products and allegedly made false and misleading statements about the human grade quality of its food in its advertisements, promotional materials and labeling.

    The Honest Kitchen Frequently Asked Questions | The Honest Kitchen

    The term feed grade refers to a product that is not suitable for consumption by people and is only to be fed to animals (“inedible”). The FDA and USDA are responsible for regulating human foods and determining ‘edible’ status. Our plant actually makes foods for human consumption and is regulated and inspected by the FDA. The Honest Kitchen is the only manufacturer in the US to have written permission from the FDA to use the term ‘human-grade” on its product labels.

    Other terms like “Human Quality” or “Table Grade” are not legal definitions for human food or pet food. And the term “Made with Human-grade Ingredients” doesn’t mean that a finished product is actually, legally, human-grade. Ingredients may start off with ‘human-grade’ status but once an ingredient has been shipped to and processed in a pet food plant, the ‘human-grade’ term can no longer legally be used.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Thanks, Janice.  That makes sense to me and I do believe that this lawsuit is simply a chance for some attorneys to make some money.  I never bought the food because it claimed to have human grade ingredients.  I bought it and continue to feed it because of the good conditon my dogs are on this food.