calliecritturs
Posted : 3/9/2009 12:59:33 PM
See that's kinda what concerned ME -- there was a LONG time between the last tick seen and onset of the "disease" (altho it can be really tricky to know that). In Billy's case his body actually had addressed the tick disease and formed antibodies to it - so when we tested him it was a FAINT positive. Meaning the antibodies were new and they showed as a faint positive rather than the NEGATIVE it really was. We had started him on prednisone and he WAS responding (his packed cell went from 20 to 29 in just a couple of days)
It's possible that he did have a mild case of IMHA or maybe the body had JUST dealt with the tick disease so the antibodies were 'new' and his body was still a little anemic. But in any event, the doxycycline likely caused the immune system to react even more strongly.
The body was still dealing with this -- and when they added doxycycline to this mix, Billy's body sent the immune system into mega overdrive. He crashed and his packed cell went from 29 on Wednesday to EIGHT on Friday night.
So be VERY VERY careful -- watch this dog EVER so closely.
Any sign whatsoever of weakness, nausea, unsteady walking, pale gums (even just a little more pale), nausea, ANYTHING UNUSUAL -- go to the vet **NOW**. Don't wait. Don't wait even a day.
And honestly, gratefuldawg's advice to go to your nearest vet school is a GOOD ONE.
IMHA is extremely difficult to deal with because it happens SO FAST. IT changes in a heartbeat. Vets typically will try to save the owner some money -- they tend NOT to react fast. You call them today, they give you an appt tomorrow or "later this week" and frankly, with IMHA the dog can be GONE by then.
2 1/2 years later my head is STILL spinning from how fast Billy 'crashed' after the addition of the antibiotic. We DID a tick test -- the standard protocol is to start PREDNISONE, not antibiotics necessarily.
Why? Because any antibiotic has to be approached with extreme caution because they CAN adversely affect IMHA. REalize that not all tick disease results IN the IMHA. So essentially you treat the IMHA **first** and then if you verify there is tick disease they usually treat later.
ANY chemical, ANY stress can trigger auto-immune disease. So you tend not to hit it with a ton of things at once at first. At least that's MY experience.
In honesty, *I* am the one who encouraged my vet to give Billy the doxycycline. I did NOT want it to be IMHA. noooooooooooooooo -- I knew people who had lost dogs to it and it scared me. I **wanted** it to be tick disease because that was treatable. Drugs for a long time? yes -- but it was treatable and not often fatal. IMHA is a killer.
BUT in encouraging my vet to give me antibiotics it was a mistake and Billy paid the price. We DID ultimately get it under control -- SIX TRANSFUSIONS LATER.
How long will the dog need to be on drugs? Completely unknown.
Billy is *not* on steroids. Hasn't been in almost 18 months. Some dogs can get totally off them (and we use Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine **in addition** to regular traditional medicine and that did help enormously).
Much depends on whether or not you can nail down what "caused" the IMHA. If the cause was a toxin (like a tick bite, chemicals like vaccines, flea/tick preparations, pesticides, chemicals sprayed around your home or neighborhood, etc.) then the prognosis for getting the dog off the drugs is BETTER than if the IMHA is truly spontaneous.