BCMixs
Posted : 4/3/2008 2:45:38 PM
I was told by the staff at Hemopet (where I sent the sample) that Kansas is the only place doing the rabies titers and that's where our sample was forwarded on to. What I've read about titers is that they are indicative of one type of protection and that there is another "system" in the body if you will that's not mobilized until an exposure and there's not a proven way to test that at the present time. But that the level of detectable antibodies shown in a titer is a way of showing that the dog does have circulating antibodies for a given disease. It could be from challenge or from vaccination, but it's there.
In any event, he was boostered, but I feel it was unnecessary given his titer results.
BTW, Kansas is the same place vet students have to have their titers done, so I think the results are pretty reliable. Good enough for humans, good enough for my pup.
One other thing: If you can't use titers as a way of determining the need for boosters, and there's not a way to test the other protective responses of the body, what ARE you supposed to use in making a determination on revaccination? It seems to me that blind revaccination isn't very smart. At least a titer result gives you some indication of the level of immunity that's present. Granted, any given dog could have a compromised immune system or be inundated by a large volume of disease from, say a bite from an animal in the end stages of rabies, and that bite directly enters a major blood supply. But, in my personal case, I'm not going to allow the highly unlikely "what if" scenarios determine the frequency with which I choose to vaccinate my dogs. I feel that at least with titer results, I'm making an informed choice, versus just blindly sticking virus into my dog with no idea whatsoever what his response is and if he's protected. Studies I've read indicate some animals may be poor responders and without a titer, an owner would have no idea.
Just my .02