ziggynemo -- I'm not trying to *convince* you ... only to let you know where I got my info from. And shoot -- if we're going to count vets, I get to count Dr. D the holistic vet, Dr. B. the regular vet, and Dr. Clemmons, Dr. Xie, Dr. Crissman, Dr. Marsalla and 3 others up at the U of Florida??? Yipe -- no wonder I'm

oor LOL.
But that's the point -- we all do a ton of research and still wind up having to learn from experience. My Muffin the Intrepid (gone two years now as an end result of renal failure) was a mega allergy boy ... MAX dose of antihistamine his whole life (8 years) and none of the myriad vets he had ever warned me that anthistamines could be rough on the kidneys because they needed to keep the dog comfortable TODAY and no studies have shown categorically that such doses *will* cause problems, only that they *might*. Or that some have in the past. And it's only as I've gotten more and more holistically minded that I've understood that.
So I lost Muffin way sooner than we wanted to -- and he had every problem known to man about 'cockers'. This is a dog with virtually no immune system who had lifelong MAJOR skin problems, ear problems (he had both ears removed) that were likely allergy related, then add cancer and finally renal problems. Renal problems caused by?? Probably weakened kidneys (weakened **maybe** by long-term antihistamine use) but likely majorly damaged by chemo that we did too long (yes, at the insistence of one of the vets at U of FL vet school in Gainesville).
So I'm not saying "THIS" will cause long term problems -- I'm simply throwing out a caution so please don't take me as being personally critical here -- in fact I'm trying way way too hard here to be sure I've explained myself so no one feels 'picked on'.
But my point is my experience reaches beyond what I"ve read or even what's happened with ONE dog.
Also -- someone above mentioned finding the "cause" (her comment in regard to allergy 'testing') -- but the other point I'm making here is that when you get a dog who is MAJORLY allergic, sometimes it is smart to go around behind and try to find out **why** the body is so incredibly sensitive to allergies. Yes, allergies are definitely immune-related. BUT, for a huge example, they are also prone to be thyroid related. Not that thyroid 'causes' allergies. It doesn't.
BUT thyroid deficiency (hypothyroid) can set the skin up to embrace any skin problem it finds! A year ago I was going wild trying to keep Billy's skin (another cocker) in one piece!! I was, (at the recommend again of 3 vets with completely different backgrounds) bathing him DAILY. To cleans allergens off his skin (because allergens go trans-dermal not just into the mouth or nose). Soaking his feet, COOKING a special diet, a ton of vet recommended supplements, and nearly daily need for him to be on antibiotics and beyond (and way too many bouts of pred just to get his skin so he could stand living inside it!).
Testing? We know most of what he's 'allergic' to ... but I also had blood tests/thyroid tests done out the ying yang. In fact, last summer it got SO bad at one point we had it biopsied and yet a third thyroid test done. I was beyond frantic and I've never spent so much time on one dog's skin and not be able to 'win' at all.
The thyroid test always came back "a bit low but definitely within norms". *sigh*
FINALLY, after reading the success several folks had on here, my holistic vet and I agreed one MORE thyroid test was in order. But this time send it to either Dr. Jean Dodds herself, OR to Michigan State (she built their lab and they use her protocols religiously).
I'm a legal secretary and just figuring out how to sent it to Dr. Dodds (you have to get the blood spun and then overnighted FROZEN to her) was beyond me, but my regular vet was willing to send it to Michigan State (he had worked with them in the past on other things).
RAH --- **DO IT**!!!!
Lo and behold -- thyroid test #4 sent to Michigan State rather than a traditional lab ... LOW THYROID!! Not 'ultra' low but definitely low enough to be a problem in both values. Aha!!
Once again, my holistic vet sticks her opinion in "Use Armour thyroid NOT synthetic thyroid -- it's natural -- it is porcine thyroid -- and it's more hormonally balanced. He'll do better on it."
In for a penny, in for a pound ... so Armour thyroid it was.
Instant results? NO. BUT, he acted a bit better. And altho we started it when he was absolutely at his worst and once again that time we had to resort ultimately to pred and strong antibiotics to turn it around ... yes, THIS time we got it to heal ... and ... WHOA ... it .... ***stayed*** for a while. In fact, all the way thru Christmas Billy only had to be bathed like every other week (and he thot THAT was the best!).
Soon as January hit tho, with spring Florida allergies maxing out the skin begins to degrade .... not nearly as bad as last year, but worse than I was at all comfortable with.
But this is thryoid -- it's not *causing* skin problems -- just allowing them TO happen. So he's been on this four months and I'm thinking he should be tested again, right??
It came back from Michigan State ... well, frankly ... a *bit* low. Not as low as before, but then I had 3 more vets disagreeing. The traditional "regular" vet says "Well, if he's being thyroid supplemented I would expect the numbers in the middle of it ... not low, not high but bang in the middle!! For supplemented thyroid I think it's too low".
The holistic vet (2 of them in fact) say "but it IS within norm and we want to avoid any excessive supplementing ..." So they try to supplement the supplement ... trying to get the dog's own thyroid to work 'harder'.
It didn't work ... and in my own gut I felt we just hadn't reached the right 'dose' of the armour thyroid for MY dog. So the vets compromised -- the regular vet wanted to go to 1 1/2 pills or 2. The holistic vet says no more. So I offered the compromise of 1 1/4 and we'll test again but we'll also see how he responds.
The 1 1/4 dose turned the trick!!! It was what HE needed. Almost immediately minimal allergy treatment WORKED. The skin is GREAT. He's getting a minimal 25 mg cap of benedryl twice a day (and he's 28-30 pounds) AND he is getting some homeopathics to help the body deal with the incoming histamines.
He's seen both vets this week and they are over the moon about how GREAT his skin is.
Not flawless -- and we've got this little internal inside-the-ear-drum infection that's likely allergy-related. But by heaven we ARE getting the body to respond and deal. I'm not going stark raving mad trying to bathe him every day ... phew!!!
Again, sorry this is long -- my points are few:
1. When allergies are THIS much of a problem, find out *why*. Is there a specific one allergen that's so off the scale that removing that one will make a difference? Or is it low thyroid that's setting the body up to fail no matter what else you do?
2. They don't call it the medical "arts" for nothing. Because no matter how many vets spout to me and each other "76% of those studied show positive results with ___ mg/lb of ABC drug." there is still the question "Is my dog one of the 76% or one of the 24% of the 'other' ones?
3. No one vet is 'god' ... and as most of us have seen even when you take a dog to all kinds of specialists, sometimes they'll agree and sometimes they'll have different ideas. And even when they do agree -- sometimes the dog does get better and sometimes it doesn't.
So you're often back to common sense. and trying other stuff and a little harder, and hopefully a little smarter to find what will work with *this* dog.
Don't think I'm saying thyroid is the answer for every dog. IT IS NOT. But in my long story above, I hope folks saw that even when we found something that helped it took adjusting and working with it to reach any sort of balance.
And frankly -- my *goal* is to get him on less and less anthistamine ... maybe not off fully (altho that would suit me) but to at least be able to adjust it more seasonally. (tough in Florida - it's green and growing here year round), but if I can rely more on homeopathics (which won't have the side effects) I'm gonna be personally happier. Because just for once, I want an allergy dog to still be making me crazy when he's 20. If it please the Alpha of all Alphas, I want THIS dog to be with me for many years.
Cos allergy dogs are far more prone to cancer simply because allergies and the immune system are so darned 'tied' -- and my ultimate goal is to help the immune system deal with life as it ought to. *sigh*And maybe if I can get my dog's immune system to work better, maybe I can get mine to work better too. *sigh again*.
Of all the dog problems I've dealt with, I think allergies are perhaps the most frustrating simply because you know the dog has to be SO uncomfortable constantly and you know it's affecting so much else ... and it's just more work than anything else.
Shelly - to specifically answer your question ... the honest answer is "I don't know". Why? Because it is so incredibly difficult to know when the kidneys ARE failing. You won't see blood results until you are IN renal failure. Advanced renal failure. So by the time you see the BUN and Creat numbers as 'bad' your dog is far gone.
The only thing YOU ... as the guardian .... can do, is to be proactive. This, bottom line, is where I come from. Can I say the max dose of allergy meds id *GOING* to cause renal problems? No way. In one dog it might, it another it won't. And no study is gonna show that because no study is really being done, to my knowledge. They don't want to prove antihistamines harmful --that's not how grants and studies work. They only want to prove something harmful if they have some other wonder drug they want to prove IS the answer.
So, I take MY answer from knowing simply that antihistamines *can* be tough on the kidneys (not even categorically harmful ... but just "tough" on them), so then I work my behind off to find a better solution for THIS dog. My last mega allergy dog got the max dose because it was the best I could do for Muffin the Intrepid. And it gave him 8 good years. It helped him. I can *not* kick myself over what I did for him -- we did our absolute best. But Billy is already in better health than Muffin ever had. So for this dog, I want better.
Does that make ANY sense to anyone?? I'm not going to make any flat statement that anyone is not doing their best, because gosh darn it WE ALL ARE.
Allergies are like the new dog plague *sigh*. It has to be THE most often discussed thing on this board. At least regarding health issues. Just count how many threads are active right now that are allergy-related -- like 6 of them when I counted last night!
But honestly -- I wish like heck someone had SAID to me 6 years ago that large doses of antihistamine *might* be bad. It might not have altered my decision ... but it would have given me pause for thought. And we thot by getting Muffin's blood 'tested' every few months we could TELL if the kidneys were in distress. You can't. And no one told me THAT either -- vets won't load you with 'what ifs' if they think you are maxxed doing the best for this dog that you can!! They don't want you to walk away feeling like they put you in a 'can't win' position -- that's just plain bad business in their estimation.
So I think it's unfair sometimes to expect a vet to watch all our 'tomorrows' when we're sitting there waiting for him to give us something to ease the dog's discomfort TODAY. And what may help the most today may or may not be the wisest course long term.