Danny
Posted : 3/31/2006 3:41:26 PM
Laugh Mary [

] Yes well, I did not mean to endorse any Hartz products by any means - just so I am not misunderstood. I merely tried to carefully hint that, under some circumstances, a pocket not deep enough for the 'good stuff', should consider getting one of those. Yes, they are less effective, and yes there have been problems in some instances (the product for dogs does NOT have to be taken off shelves, the changes only affect the cat-version; furthermore, Hartz does not plan to withdraw its cat product, but simply relabel it, at least as far as I am informed). Nevertheless, if a dog lives in an area with heavy tick infestation carrying Lyme, has an owner that cannot or does not want to spend very much, then it maybe is worth a (careful) try. Alternatively, one could take the dog nowhere but pavement areas and the own backyard during those months, while keeping the yard fenced and short-cut. That pretty much rules out ticks also. [

]
Addendum: "Due to safety concerns stemming from use of two flea and tick control products for cats and kittens, EPA is announcing that the Hartz Mountain Corp. has agreed to enact measures to reduce potential risks to pets from using these products. Under this agreement, Hartz has ceased sale and distribution of, and will implement a product recovery, label improvement and consumer education program for two pesticide products, Hartz Advanced Care Brand Flea and Tick Drops Plus for Cats and Kittens (EPA Reg. No. 2596-14

and Hartz Advanced Care Brand Once-a-Month Flea and Tick Drops for Cats and Kittens (EPA Reg. No.2596-151). Hartz is required to recover, repackage and re-label currently available stock. EPA sought this agreement due to concerns over safety issues based on thousands of adverse effects incidents investigated by EPA."
Also see:
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/hartzq_a.htm