glenmar
Posted : 3/15/2008 7:50:57 AM
Sometimes, folks, stuff happens. Plans get shot all to heck because of job loss. NO ONE is immune from being downsized. Well, unless perhaps they are wealthy or own the company or whatever.
So, "someone" sets age and time limits, someone determines X criteria for when a dog must be altered, and someone carefully registers each and every dog that is placed/sold/whatever. A few months later, the pet parent is out of work.....the savings are dwindling because the economy is sluggish, lots of jobs are being lost, and folks aren't being hired elsewhere. And the cost of gas to even job hunt is daunting.
So, the time comes and goes, and the "reproductive police" realize that dog A isn't altered yet. Then what? Rip the dog out of a loving home that is doing everything under the sun to provide for said dog but simply can NOT right now afford a surgery for altering? Impose a fine that those people simply can't pay?
In a perfect world, everyone would be able to afford everything, including altering their animals. But, in a perfect world, old people wouldn't be eating canned cat food, children wouldn't be going without medical care and PEOPLE wouldn't be homeless either.
Good and responsible people can go through some horrible things through no fault of their own. In the REAL world, bad things happen to good people and darn it, we shouldn't make things worse for them by ripping their animals out of their loving arms.
IMHO it is not right for the government to take away MORE of our choices, including the choices that we make for our animals, whether by actual decision or just because "spit happens" Rather than make and attempt to enforce even more laws, put the $$, which no one has determined the source of, to better use by educating AND providing free or really low cost altering.
There can be some very real issues with early altering. It should be the decision of the owner and their vet when altering is done. Not the governments.