THIS BOTHERS ME SO MUCH

did Admin weigh in on this? IMO it was far removed from family friendly...was anything posted? I have been out of it a day or so...so if it's been handled lemme know.

The child is 16...and if all those posting did not know that they might have posted differently. I certainly would not discuss my sex life with a 16y/o and a reminder needs to go out as a general thing if many did.

Just my .02

 Sorry, forgot to post here.  Yes I did post a warning, if there are posts subsequent to that which need editing, they're fair game LOL.

I'm a bit fuzzy today, came down with a cold this morning.

Thanks Kate for putting in the warning. It has continued... but, considering how bad it was before I'm not sure we can edit after the warning.  The stuff after the warning isn't any better than the stuff prior to the warning.  I cannot get over so many are willing to discuss their sex life on a forum with a 16 yrs old.  I hope its a case of people not know her age, but Ron alludes to a "yougin'" at one point.....

If they're ignoring a warning posted by Admin then yes edits can be made...and should also be made to posts beforehand as well, IMO. If they are off topic we can edit for that as well. The topic was dog in the room for whoopie not when where how many positions you've had sex in. Period.

 Gina's right, they're ignoring, so lay the smackdown.

Posted the below in thread...

Another Mod warning

As the Admin has already made a request...I will also add...to stay on the topic of this thread, which was very specific and without ANY need of much explanation or detail. Anything else is OT and will henceforth be removed.

The three strike rule applies as well.

Bear in mind that there are minors on this forum...including the one that started this thread.

Edits may still be made. Please do remember the rules of the forum...and consider the potential age of the membership when posting. Our personal filters may all be different...but that does not exempt you from the rules here

It should buy us time while we decide what/if edits to make.

Right on, Gina!

Personally there were some very explicit things mentioned... i guess our guide should be what would we feel comfortable with our children or younger family members reading.  We are all different in tolerance levels, so I guess finding the 'average' of tolerance and drawing a line.

How do we do that? LOL

You know who was always good at that? Jaime lol...maybe we can make her do it....haha...

I haven't gone thru the entire thread...if something jumps out at you AR it and we can all have a conflab....since you already know where some "juicy" stuff is I'll let you do it so we don't end up with a ton of doubles....

Once we get a consensus we can start slicing and dicing LOL.

I'm done reporting. ... take a peak.

If we can get Jaime to do it, AMEN!! :o)  JAAAAAY-MEEEEEEEEEE.......

My input is up on much of it...I am planning on sending the below to misstrouble pending Admin approval, we cannot let dog.com potentially come up on charges for this sort of sexual talk with a minor...many people in that thread were treading the line mightly close :

I emailed Jaime...

 That's perfect, Gina, don't change a word.  I'll go through the thread as much as I can tonight and file AR's, I can do edits in the morning.  I'm fading though so much of it may get done in the AM.

Kate Lani's filed a bunch already...so double check you aren't doubling...if it lets you double? Not sure. But I've responded with my input in the AR's there.

I will send the note to misstrouble. Thank you Kate. I hate bothering you with this when you're sick tho Knucklehead youth of America.

rwbeagles

I hate bothering you with this when you're sick tho Knucklehead youth of America.

I'm sick, you're tired, Lani's cold...I wonder how Karen is?  LOL.  And we have knucklehead youths here too....except we'd call them "yoofs" LOL.